Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher J. Hazard

dblp:10/5765 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0002-2601-0587ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Authentication and access control · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › trust modeling
reputation systems
0.212013
Macau: A Basis for Evaluating Reputation Systems · IJCAI 2013
Computational finance and economics
electronic commerce
0.012011
Intertemporal Discount Factors as a Measure of Trustworthiness in Electronic Commerce · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2011
Computational finance and economics › electronic commerce
online marketplace
0.012011
Intertemporal Discount Factors as a Measure of Trustworthiness in Electronic Commerce · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

utility theory · 0.2discount factors · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Macau: A Basis for Evaluating Reputation Systems
Christopher J. Hazard, Munindar P. Singh
IJCAI1
2011 Intertemporal Discount Factors as a Measure of Trustworthiness in Electronic Commerce
abstract
In multiagent interactions, such as e-commerce and file sharing, being able to accurately assess the trustworthiness of others is important for agents to protect themselves from losing utility. Focusing on rational agents in e-commerce, we prove that an agent's discount factor (time preference of utility) is a direct measure of the agent's trustworthiness for a set of reasonably general assumptions and definitions. We propose a general list of desiderata for trust systems and discuss how discount factors as trustworthiness meet these desiderata. We discuss how discount factors are a robust measure when entering commitments that exhibit moral hazards. Using an online market as a motivating example, we derive some analytical methods both for measuring discount factors and for aggregating the measurements.
Christopher J. Hazard, Munindar P. Singh
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2007 The game of scale: decision making with economies of scale
abstract
While diffusion of innovation topics in economics and majority games in game theory have been widely studied, the impact of economy-of-scale effects in aggregated decision making has received little attention. In this paper, we present a basic model, the Game of Scale, to study the effects of economy-of-scale in decision making among a large pool of self-interested agents. We solve the model's static equilibria and present two dynamic decision models, one myopic and one trend-following. Most of the parameter space converges quickly; however, the behaviors exhibited near critical input values show drastic changes. We demonstrate how trend-following can improve global outcomes over myopic decision making. Finally, we describe how the game can be externally controlled.
Christopher J. Hazard, Peter R. Wurman
ICEC1