Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Behzad Montazeri

dblp:10/5808 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software design principles
coupling and cohesion
0.011996
Chidamber and Kemerer's Metrics Suite: A Measurement Theory Perspective · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1996
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
object-oriented metrics
0.011996
Chidamber and Kemerer's Metrics Suite: A Measurement Theory Perspective · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1996
Empirical software engineering
software metrics
0.011996
Chidamber and Kemerer's Metrics Suite: A Measurement Theory Perspective · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

measurement theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Chidamber and Kemerer's Metrics Suite: A Measurement Theory Perspective
abstract
The metrics suite for object-oriented design put forward by Chidamber and Kemerer (1994) is partly evaluated by applying principles of measurement theory. Using the object coupling measure (CBO) as an example, it is shown that failing to establish a sound empirical relation system can lead to deficiencies of software metrics. Similarly, for the object-oriented cohesion measure (LCOM) it is pointed out that the issue of empirically testing the representation condition must not be ignored, even if other validation principles are carefully obeyed. As a by-product, an alternative formulation for LCOM is proposed.
Martin Hitz, Behzad Montazeri
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2