Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Kilgore
dblp:10/7058
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 62% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 38% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | RESISTing reliability degradation through proactive reconfiguration · ASE 2010 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
reliability analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | RESISTing reliability degradation through proactive reconfiguration · ASE 2010 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › system reliability
software reliability |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | RESISTing reliability degradation through proactive reconfiguration · ASE 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
runtime reliability prediction · 0.1proactive reconfiguration · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | RESISTing reliability degradation through proactive reconfigurationabstractSituated software systems are an emerging class of systems that are predominantly pervasive, embedded, and mobile. They are marked with a high degree of unpredictability and dynamism in the execution context. At the same time, such systems often need to satisfy strict reliability requirements. Most current software reliability analysis approaches are not suitable for situated software systems. We propose an approach geared to such systems, which continuously furnishes refined reliability predictions at runtime by incorporating various sources of information. The reliability predictions are leveraged to proactively place the software in the optimal configuration with respect to changing conditions. Our approach considers two representative architectural reconfiguration decisions that impact the system's reliability: reallocation of components to processes and changing the architectural style. We have realized the approach as part of a framework intended for mission-critical settings, called REsilient SItuated SofTware system (RESIST), and evaluated it using a mobile emergency response system. Deshan Cooray, Sam Malek, Roshanak Roshandel, David Kilgore |
ASE | 4 |