EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Talpey
dblp:10/871
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 5Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers |
Storage systems · 70% Cloud and datacenter computing · 30% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › file systems
distributed file system |
0.1 | 3 | 2009 | CA-NFS: A congestion-aware network file system · ACM Trans. Storage 2009 CA-NFS: A Congestion-Aware Network File System · FAST 2009 The Direct Access File System · FAST 2003 |
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
network file system |
0.1 | 2 | 2009 | CA-NFS: A Congestion-Aware Network File System · FAST 2009 CA-NFS: A congestion-aware network file system · ACM Trans. Storage 2009 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
request scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | CA-NFS: A congestion-aware network file system · ACM Trans. Storage 2009 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | CA-NFS: A congestion-aware network file system · ACM Trans. Storage 2009 |
Storage systems › i/o optimization
write optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | AWOL: An Adaptive Write Optimizations Layer · FAST 2008 |
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
direct access file system |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | The Direct Access File System · FAST 2003 |
Storage systems
file systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | The Direct Access File System · FAST 2003 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management › garbage collection
write amplification |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | AWOL: An Adaptive Write Optimizations Layer · FAST 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online auction · 0.1congestion pricing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | CA-NFS: A Congestion-Aware Network File System
Alexandros Batsakis, Randal C. Burns, Arkady Kanevsky, James Lentini, Thomas Talpey |
FAST | 5 |
| 2009 | CA-NFS: A congestion-aware network file systemabstractWe develop a holistic framework for adaptively scheduling asynchronous requests in distributed file systems. The system is holistic in that it manages all resources, including network bandwidth, server I/O, server CPU, and client and server memory utilization. It accelerates, defers, or cancels asynchronous requests in order to improve application-perceived performance directly. We employ congestion pricing via online auctions to coordinate the use of system resources by the file system clients so that they can detect shortages and adapt their resource usage. We implement our modifications in the Congestion-Aware Network File System (CA-NFS), an extension to the ubiquitous network file system (NFS). Our experimental result shows that CA-NFS results in a 20% improvement in execution times when compared with NFS for a variety of workloads. Alexandros Batsakis, Randal C. Burns, Arkady Kanevsky, James Lentini, Thomas Talpey |
ACM Trans. Storage | 5 |
| 2008 | AWOL: An Adaptive Write Optimizations Layer
Alexandros Batsakis, Randal C. Burns, Arkady Kanevsky, James Lentini, Thomas Talpey |
FAST | 5 |
| 2007 | Designing NFS with RDMA for Security, Performance and ScalabilityabstractNFS has traditionally used TCP or UDP as the underlying transport. However, the overhead of these stacks has limited both the performance and scalability of NFS. Recently, high-performance network such as InfiniBand have been deployed. These networks provide low latency of a few microseconds and high bandwidth for large messages up to 20 Gbps. Because of the unique characteristics of NFS protocols, previous designs of NFS with RDMA were unable to exploit the improved bandwidth of networks such as InfiniBand. Also, they leave the server open to attacks from malicious clients. In this paper, we discuss the design principles for implementing NFS/RDMA protocols. We propose, implement and evaluate an alternate design for NFS/RDMA on InfiniBand, which can significantly improve the security of the server, compared to the previous design. In addition, we evaluate the performance bottlenecks of using RDMA operations in NFS protocols and propose strategies and designs that tackle these overheads. With the best of these strategies and designs, we demonstrate throughput of 700 MB/s on the OpenSolaris NFS/RDMA design and 900 MB/s on the Linux design and an application level improvement in performance of up to 50%. We also evaluate the scalability of the RDMA transport in a multi-client setting, with a RAID array of disks. Our design has been integrated into the OpenSolaris kernel. Ranjit Noronha, Lei Chai, Thomas Talpey, Dhabaleswar K. Panda 0001 |
ICPP | 3 |
| 2003 | The Direct Access File System
Matt DeBergalis, Peter F. Corbett, Steve R. Kleiman, Arthur Lent, David B. Noveck, Thomas Talpey, Mark Wittle |
FAST | 6 |