Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tarek Nechma
dblp:10/9432
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 40% High-performance computing · 40% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
circuit simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Parallel Sparse Matrix Solution for Circuit Simulation on FPGAs · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015 |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA accelerator |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Parallel Sparse Matrix Solution for Circuit Simulation on FPGAs · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015 |
High-performance computing
sparse linear algebra |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Parallel Sparse Matrix Solution for Circuit Simulation on FPGAs · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015 |
High-performance computing
sparse linear solver |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Parallel Sparse Matrix Solution for Circuit Simulation on FPGAs · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015 |
Electronic design automation › circuit simulation › analog circuit simulation
SPICE simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Parallel Sparse Matrix Solution for Circuit Simulation on FPGAs · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic analysis · 0.2static pivoting · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Parallel Sparse Matrix Solution for Circuit Simulation on FPGAsabstractSPICE is the de facto standard for circuit simulation. However, accurate SPICE simulations of today’s sub-micron circuits can often take days or weeks on conventional processors. A SPICE simulation is an iterative process that consists of two phases per iteration: model evaluation followed by a matrix solution. The model evaluation phase has been found to be easily parallelizable, unlike the subsequent phase, which involves the solution of highly sparse and asymmetric matrices. In this paper, we present an FPGA implementation of a sparse matrix solver, geared towards matrices that arise in SPICE circuit simulations. Our approach combines static pivoting with symbolic analysis to compute an accurate task flow-graph which efficiently exploits parallelism at multiple granularities and sustains high floating-point data rates. We also present a quantitative comparison between the performance of our hardware prototype and state-of-the-art software packages running on a general-purpose PC. We report average speed-ups of 9.65$\times$, 11.83$\times$, and 17.21$\times$against UMFPACK, KLU, and Kundert Sparse matrix packages, respectively. Tarek Nechma, Mark Zwolinski |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |
| 2010 | Parallel sparse matrix solver for direct circuit simulations on FPGAsabstractAs part of our effort to parallelised SPICE simulations over multiple FPGAs, we present a parallel FPGA implementation for a sparse matrix solver optimised for execution on a single FPGA node. Our approach combines static pivoting with symbolic analysis to compute an accurate task flow-graph which efficiently exploits parallelism at multiple granularities and sustains high floating-point data rates. The sparse matrix solver is tested with circuit simulation matrices from the University of Florida matrix collection. We report a 10-30× speedup compared to a 2.4 GHz Intel Core Duo processor running UMFPACK, a state-of-the-art sparse matrix solver. Tarek Nechma, Mark Zwolinski, Jeffrey S. Reeve |
ISCAS | 1 |