Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lawrence Neal

dblp:10/9878 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 88% Generative modeling · 12%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable reinforcement learning
0.922021
Counterfactual state explanations for reinforcement learning agents via generative deep learning · Artif. Intell. 2021
Strategic Tasks for Explainable Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation
0.512021
Counterfactual state explanations for reinforcement learning agents via generative deep learning · Artif. Intell. 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Counterfactual state explanations for reinforcement learning agents via generative deep learning · Artif. Intell. 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
counterfactual generation
0.312018
Open Set Learning with Counterfactual Images · ECCV (6) 2018
Machine learning › Generative modeling › conditional generative model
counterfactual image generation
0.312018
Open Set Learning with Counterfactual Images · ECCV (6) 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › open-world recognition
open-set recognition
0.312018
Open Set Learning with Counterfactual Images · ECCV (6) 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generative deep learning · 0.5deep reinforcement learning · 0.4counterfactual images · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Counterfactual state explanations for reinforcement learning agents via generative deep learning
Matthew L. Olson, Roli Khanna, Lawrence Neal, Fuxin Li, Weng-Keen Wong
Artif. Intell.3
2019 Strategic Tasks for Explainable Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Commonly used sequential decision making tasks such as the games in the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE) provide rich observation spaces suitable for deep reinforcement learning. However, they consist mostly of low-level control tasks which are of limited use for the development of explainable artificial intelligence(XAI) due to the fine temporal resolution of the tasks. Many of these domains also lack built-in high level abstractions and symbols. Existing tasks that provide for both strategic decision-making and rich observation spaces are either difficult to simulate or are intractable. We provide a set of new strategic decision-making tasks specialized for the development and evaluation of explainable AI methods, built as constrained mini-games within the StarCraft II Learning Environment.
Rey Pocius, Lawrence Neal, Alan Fern
AAAI2
2018 Open Set Learning with Counterfactual Images
Lawrence Neal, Matthew L. Olson, Xiaoli Z. Fern, Weng-Keen Wong, Fuxin Li
ECCV (6)1
2011 Time-frequency segmentation of bird song in noisy acoustic environments
abstract
Recent work in machine learning considers the problem of identifying bird species from an audio recording. Most methods require segmentation to isolate each syllable of bird call in input audio. Energy-based time-domain segmentation has been successfully applied to low-noise, single-bird recordings. However, audio from automated field recorders contains too much noise for such methods, so a more robust segmentation method is required. We propose a supervised time frequency audio segmentation method using a Random Forest classifier, to extract syllables of bird call from a noisy signal. When applied to a test data set of 625 field-collected audio segments, our method isolates 93.6% of the acoustic energy of bird song with a false positive rate of 8.6%, outperforming energy thresholding.
Lawrence Neal, Forrest Briggs, Raviv Raich, Xiaoli Z. Fern
ICASSP1