Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

R. N. Braswell

dblp:11/1744 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
code generation		 0.011988
An evaluation of vector Fortran 200 generated by Cyber 205 and ETA-10 pre-compilation tools · SC 1988
Compilers and program optimization › vectorization
vectorizing compiler		 0.011988
An evaluation of vector Fortran 200 generated by Cyber 205 and ETA-10 pre-compilation tools · SC 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vectorization · 0.0precompilation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 An evaluation of vector Fortran 200 generated by Cyber 205 and ETA-10 pre-compilation tools
abstract
Vectorizing precompilers such as KAP/205 and VAST-2 complement the efficient use of Fortran on the CDC Cyber 205. With the advent of the ETA-10 and its EOS/VSOS environment, the performance of these Fortran 200 preprocessors has come under closer scrutiny. The extent or quantity of vectorization that can be achieved has been examined elsewhere with reference to a test set of Fortran DO loops. The quality of the translated code is also considered. KAP/205 and VAST-2 are contrasted in this respect to reveal differences in the vectorized Fortran.>
R. N. Braswell, Malcolm S. Keech
 SC1