Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Markus Goldstein

dblp:11/2550 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2631-6882ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › attack resilience › attack mitigation › denial-of-service defense
DDoS defense
0.112008
High performance traffic shaping for DDoS mitigation · CoNEXT 2008
Network security
traffic shaping
0.112008
High performance traffic shaping for DDoS mitigation · CoNEXT 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random early detection · 0.1kernel module · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Explainable Outlier Detection Using Feature Ranking for k-Nearest Neighbors, Gaussian Mixture Model and Autoencoders
Lucas Krenmayr, Markus Goldstein
ICPRAM2
2016 A Comparative Study on Outlier Removal from a Large-scale Dataset using Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
abstract
Outlier removal from training data is a classical problem in pattern recognition. Nowadays, this problem becomes more important for large-scale datasets by the following two reasons: First, we will have a higher risk of “unexpected” outliers, such as mislabeled training data. Second, a large-scale dataset makes it more difficult to grasp the distribution of outliers. On the other hand, many unsupervised anomaly detection methods have been proposed, which can be also used for outlier removal. In this paper, we present a comparative study of nine different anomaly detection methods in the scenario of outlier removal from a large-scale dataset. For accurate performance observation, we need to use a simple and describable recognition procedure and thus utilize a nearest neighbor-based classifier. As an adequate large-scale dataset, we prepared a handwritten digit dataset comprising of more than 800,000 manually labeled samples. With a data dimensionality of 16×16 = 256, it is ensured that each digit class has at least 100 times more instances than data dimensionality. The experimental results show that the common understanding that outlier removal improves classification performance on small datasets is not true for high-dimensional large-scale datasets. Additionally, it was found that local anomaly detection algorithms perform better on this data than their global equivalents.
Markus Goldstein, Seiichi Uchida
ICPRAM1
2014 Automatic classifier selection for non-experts
Matthias Reif, Faisal Shafait, Markus Goldstein, Thomas M. Breuel, Andreas Dengel 0001
Pattern Anal. Appl.3
2013 Document Authentication Using Printing Technique Features and Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
abstract
Automatically identifying that a certain page in a set of documents is printed with a different printer than the rest of the documents can give an important clue for a possible forgery attempt. Different printers vary in their produced printing quality, which is especially noticeable at the edges of printed characters. In this paper, a system using the difference in edge roughness to distinguish laser printed ages from inkjet printed pages is presented. Several feature extraction methods have been developed and evaluated for that purpose. In contrast to previous work, this system uses unsupervised anomaly detection to detect documents printed by a different printing technique than the majority of the documents among a set. This approach has the advantage that no prior training using genuine documents has to be done. Furthermore, we created a dataset featuring 1200 document images from different domains (invoices, contracts, scientific papers) printed by 7 different inkjet and 13 laser printers. Results show that the presented feature extraction method achieves the best outlier rank score in comparison to state-of-the-art features.
Johann Gebhardt, Markus Goldstein, Faisal Shafait, Andreas Dengel 0001
ICDAR2
2013 Enhancing Security Event Management Systems with Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
Markus Goldstein, Stefan Asanger, Matthias Reif, Andrew Hutchison
ICPRAM1
2012 FastLOF: An Expectation-Maximization based Local Outlier detection algorithm
Markus Goldstein
ICPR1
2009 Server-Side Prediction of Source IP Addresses Using Density Estimation
abstract
Source IP addresses are often used as a major feature for user modeling in computer networks. Particularly in the field of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack detection and mitigation traffic models make extensive use of source IP addresses for detecting anomalies. Typically the real IP address distribution is strongly undersampled due to a small amount of observations. Density estimation overcomes this shortage by taking advantage of IP neighborhood relations. In many cases simple models are implicitly used or chosen intuitively as a network based heuristic. In this paper we review and formalize existing models including a hierarchical clustering approach first. In addition, we present a modified k-means clustering algorithm for source IP density estimation as well as a statistical motivated smoothing approach using the Nadaraya-Watson kernel-weighted average. For performance evaluation we apply all methods on a 90 days real world dataset consisting of 1.3 million different source IP addresses and try to predict the users of the following next 10 days. ROC curves and an example DDoS mitigation scenario show that there is no uniformly better approach: k-means performs best when a high detection rate is needed whereas statistical smoothing works better for low false alarm rate requirements like the DDoS mitigation scenario.
Markus Goldstein, Matthias Reif, Armin Stahl, Thomas M. Breuel
ARES1
2008 High performance traffic shaping for DDoS mitigation
abstract
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack mitigation systems usually generate a list of filter rules in order to block malicious traffic. In contrast to this binary decision we suggest to use traffic shaping whereas the bandwidth limit is defined by the probability of a source to be a legal user. As a proof of concept, we implemented a simple high performance Linux kernel module nf-HiShape which is able to shape thousands of source IP addresses at different bandwidth limits even under high packet rates. Our shaping algorithm is comparable to Random Early Detection (RED) applied on every single source IP range. The evaluation shows, that our kernel module can handle up to 50,000 IP ranges at nearly constant throughput whereas Linux tc already decreases throughput at about 200 ranges.
Markus Goldstein, Matthias Reif, Armin Stahl, Thomas M. Breuel
CoNEXT1
2008 Anomaly detection by combining decision trees and parametric densities
abstract
In this paper a modified decision tree algorithm for anomaly detection is presented. During the tree building process, densities for the outlier class are used directly in the split point determination algorithm. No artificial counter-examples have to be sampled from the unknown class, which yields to more precise decision boundaries and a deterministic classification result. Furthermore, the prior of the outlier class can be used to adjust the sensitivity of the anomaly detector. The proposed method combines the advantages of classification trees with the benefit of a more accurate representation of the outliers. For evaluation, we compare our approach with other state-of-the-art anomaly detection algorithms on four standard data sets including the KDD-Cup 99. The results show that the proposed method performs as well as more complex approaches and is even superior on three out of four data sets.
Matthias Reif, Markus Goldstein, Armin Stahl, Thomas M. Breuel
ICPR2