EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephen J. Mellor
dblp:11/3358
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 11 · 7 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
software design methodology |
0.0 | 2 | 1994 | Methodology Standards: Help or Hindrance? · OOPSLA 1994 Panel - Which Method is Best? · OOPSLA 1993 |
Requirements engineering and software design
object-oriented development |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | The OO Software Development Process (Panel) · OOPSLA 1992 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | The Gap between Specification and Synthesis
Stephen J. Mellor |
MODELSWARD | 1 |
| 2012 | Domain Modeling
Stephen J. Mellor |
ICSOFT | 1 |
| 2010 | Models. Models. Models. so What?
Stephen J. Mellor |
ICSOFT (1) | 1 |
| 2009 | Models. Models. Models. So What?
Stephen J. Mellor |
MoDELS | 1 |
| 2007 | Creativity, Automation and Technology
Stephen J. Mellor |
ENASE | 1 |
| 2005 | Why Systems-on-Chip Needs More UML like a Hole in the HeadabstractSoC can most certainly make use of UML; SoC just does not need more UML, or even all of it. The advent of model mappings, coupled with marks that indicate which mapping rule to apply, enable a major simplification of the rise of UML in SoC. Stephen J. Mellor, John R. Wolfe, Campbell McCausland |
DATE | 1 |
| 2001 | Raising the Level of Abstraction: Model Execution and Translation
Stephen J. Mellor |
SEKE | 1 |
| 1996 | Translation: Myth or Reality? (Panel Session)abstractIn the realm of OO methodologies there are two major schools of thought. Both schools claim to define mechanisms whereby software applications can be created that are reusable, maintainable, and robust. Moreover, both schools claim to use abstraction as a key mechanism for achieving these benefits. At issue is whether or not these two schools are fundamentally different, or just variations on an object-oriented theme.Shlaer and Mellor have dubbed one of these schools Translational. In the translational approach, two models are created. One is an abstract model of the application domain which is devoid of any design dependencies. The other model is an abstract model of the design which is devoid of any application dependencies. These two models are composed automatically to yield the code for the system.The other school - supported by Booch, Rumbaugh, Jacobson, and Martin - views the architecture of a system from several different perspectives of abstraction, e.g. logical, physical. These abstractions typically form a layer; abstractions in the logical sense manifest themselves as individual classes as well as collaborations of classes. There may be one layered model, at different layers of abstraction, or, especially given the Objectory view point, there may be multiple models, with an analysis model that's nearly independent from the design model.The panel will explore:• Is there a seamless transition between analysis and design?• Should there be a single model or should there be two - one for the analysis and one for the design?• If there are two models, how are they bridged?• What, if any, are the differences in process between the two schools?• How does architecture manifest itself!• Is there, in fact, a real difference between the two schools of thought?As a result of this exploration, we hope to answer the question: Is translation a myth or is it a reality? Steven Fraser 0001, Robert C. Martin, Stephen J. Mellor, Grady Booch, Stephen Garone, Martin Fowler, Douglas C. Schmidt, Marie Lenzi |
OOPSLA | 3 |
| 1994 | Methodology Standards: Help or Hindrance?abstractarticle Free Access Share on Methodology standards: help or hindrance? Authors: Grady Booch Rational Software Corporation Rational Software CorporationView Profile , Brian Henderson-Sellers University of Technology, Sydney University of Technology, SydneyView Profile , Ivar Jacobson Objective Systems AB Objective Systems ABView Profile , Steve Mellor Project Technology, Inc. Project Technology, Inc.View Profile , James Rumbaugh GE GEView Profile , Rebecca Wirfs-Brock Digitalk DigitalkView Profile , Chairman: David Monarchi University of Colorado, Boulder University of Colorado, BoulderView Profile Authors Info & Claims ACM SIGPLAN NoticesVolume 29Issue 10Oct. 1994 pp 223–228https://doi.org/10.1145/191081.191115Online:01 October 1994Publication History 5citation0DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations5Total Downloads0Last 12 Months0Last 6 weeks0 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF David E. Monarchi, Grady Booch, Brian Henderson-Sellers, Ivar Jacobson, Stephen J. Mellor, James E. Rumbaugh, Rebecca Wirfs-Brock |
OOPSLA | 5 |
| 1993 | Panel - Which Method is Best?
Rich Mendez, Rebecca Wirfs-Brock, James E. Rumbaugh, Stephen J. Mellor, Ivar Jacobson, Grady Booch |
OOPSLA | 4 |
| 1992 | The OO Software Development Process (Panel)abstractArticle Free Access Share on The OO software development process (panel) Authors: Dennis de Champeaux View Profile , Bob Balzer View Profile , Dave Bulman View Profile , Kathleen Culver-Lozo View Profile , Ivar Jacobson View Profile , Stephen J. Mellor View Profile Authors Info & Claims OOPSLA '92: Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applicationsOctober 1992Pages 484–489https://doi.org/10.1145/141936.141974Published:31 October 1992Publication History 0citation383DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations0Total Downloads383Last 12 Months9Last 6 weeks0 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF Dennis de Champeaux, Robert Balzer, Dave Bulman, Kathleen Culver-Lozo, Ivar Jacobson, Stephen J. Mellor |
OOPSLA | 6 |