Translational biology posits a strong bi-directional link between clinical phenotypes and a patient's biological profile. By leveraging this bi-directional link, we can efficiently deconvolute pre-existing clinical information into biological profiles. However, traditional computational tools are limited in their ability to resolve this link because of the relatively small sizes of paired clinical-biological datasets for training and the high dimensionality/sparsity of tabular clinical data. Here, we use state-of-the-art foundation models (FMs) for electronic health record (EHR) data to generate proteomics profiles of pregnant patients, thereby deconvoluting pre-existing clinical information into biological profiles without the cost and effort of running large-scale traditional omics studies. We show that FM-derived representations of a patient's EHR data coupled with a fully connected neural network prediction head can generate 206 blood protein expression levels. Interestingly, these proteins were enriched for developmental pathways, while proteins not able to be generated from EHR data were enriched for metabolic pathways. Finally, we show a proteomic signature of gestational diabetes that includes proteins with established and novel links to gestational diabetes. These results showcase the power of FM-derived EHR representations in efficiently generating biological states of pregnant patients. This capability can revolutionize disease understanding and therapeutic development, offering a cost-effective, time-efficient, and less invasive alternative to traditional methods of generating proteomics.

OBJECTIVES: Federated learning (FL) has gained popularity in clinical research in recent years to facilitate privacy-preserving collaboration. Structured data, one of the most prevalent forms of clinical data, has experienced significant growth in volume concurrently, notably with the widespread adoption of electronic health records in clinical practice. This review examines FL applications on structured medical data, identifies contemporary limitations, and discusses potential innovations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched 5 databases, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL, to identify articles that applied FL to structured medical data and reported results following the PRISMA guidelines. Each selected publication was evaluated from 3 primary perspectives, including data quality, modeling strategies, and FL frameworks. RESULTS: Out of the 1193 papers screened, 34 met the inclusion criteria, with each article consisting of one or more studies that used FL to handle structured clinical/medical data. Of these, 24 utilized data acquired from electronic health records, with clinical predictions and association studies being the most common clinical research tasks that FL was applied to. Only one article exclusively explored the vertical FL setting, while the remaining 33 explored the horizontal FL setting, with only 14 discussing comparisons between single-site (local) and FL (global) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The existing FL applications on structured medical data lack sufficient evaluations of clinically meaningful benefits, particularly when compared to single-site analyses. Therefore, it is crucial for future FL applications to prioritize clinical motivations and develop designs and methodologies that can effectively support and aid clinical practice and research.