EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
André Silva 0002
dblp:11/4638-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6667-4970ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Debugging and program repair · 50% Program synthesis and code generation · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Debugging and program repair
automated program repair |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program Repair · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program Repair · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parameter-efficient fine-tuning · 0.9large language model · 0.9adapter tuning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program RepairabstractAutomated Program Repair (APR) has evolved significantly with the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs). Fine-tuning LLMs for program repair is a recent avenue of research, with many dimensions which have not been explored. Existing work mostly fine-tune LLMs with naive code representations and does not scale to frontier models. To address this problem, we propose RepairLLaMA, a novel program repair approach that 1) identifies optimal code representations for APR with fine-tuned models, and 2) pioneers state-of-the-art parameter-efficient fine-tuning technique (PEFT) for program repair. This results in RepairLLaMA producing a highly effective ‘program repair adapter’ for fixing bugs with AI. Our experiments demonstrate the validity of both concepts. First, fine-tuning adapters with program repair specific code representations enables the model to use meaningful repair signals and produce better patches. Second, parameter-efficient fine-tuning helps fine-tuning to converge and clearly contributes to the effectiveness of RepairLLaMA in fixing bugs outside the fine-tuning data distribution. Overall, RepairLLaMA correctly fixes 144 Defects4J v2, 109 HumanEval-Java, and 20 GitBug-Java bugs, outperforming all baselines. André Silva 0002, Sen Fang, Martin Monperrus |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2024 | GitBug-Java: A Reproducible Benchmark of Recent Java BugsabstractBug-fix benchmarks are essential for evaluating methodologies in automatic program repair (APR) and fault localization (FL). However, existing benchmarks, exemplified by Defects4J, need to evolve to incorporate recent bug-fixes aligned with contemporary development practices. Moreover, reproducibility, a key scientific principle, has been lacking in bug-fix benchmarks. To address these gaps, we present GitBug-Java, a reproducible benchmark of recent Java bugs. GitBug-Java features 199 bugs extracted from the 2023 commit history of 55 notable open-source repositories. The methodology for building GitBug-Java ensures the preservation of bug-fixes in fully-reproducible environments. We publish GitBug-Java at https://github.com/gitbugactions/gitbug-java. André Silva 0002, Nuno Saavedra, Martin Monperrus |
MSR | 1 |