Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Idan Goldenberg

dblp:11/545 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Coding theory · 85% Computational complexity · 8% Information theory · 6%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › LDPC codes
linear programming decoding
0.322013
The Approximate Maximum-Likelihood Certificate · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2013
Improved Linear Programming Decoding of LDPC Codes and Bounds on the Minimum and Fractional Distance · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
LDPC codes
0.222011
Improved Linear Programming Decoding of LDPC Codes and Bounds on the Minimum and Fractional Distance · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Upper bound on error exponent of regular LDPC codes transmitted over the BEC · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Coding theory
channel coding
0.222009
Upper bound on error exponent of regular LDPC codes transmitted over the BEC · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Coding for Parallel Channels: Gallager Bounds and Applications to Turbo-Like Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
decoding algorithms
0.212013
The Approximate Maximum-Likelihood Certificate · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2013
Coding theory
fractional distance
0.112011
Improved Linear Programming Decoding of LDPC Codes and Bounds on the Minimum and Fractional Distance · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.112011
Improved Linear Programming Decoding of LDPC Codes and Bounds on the Minimum and Fractional Distance · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Information theory › communication channels › channel models › binary-input channel
binary erasure channel
0.112009
Upper bound on error exponent of regular LDPC codes transmitted over the BEC · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Coding theory › channel coding › error exponent
error exponent analysis
0.112009
Upper bound on error exponent of regular LDPC codes transmitted over the BEC · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.112007
Coding for Parallel Channels: Gallager Bounds and Applications to Turbo-Like Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007
Coding theory › channel coding › error probability bounds
gallager bound
0.112007
Coding for Parallel Channels: Gallager Bounds and Applications to Turbo-Like Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › concatenated codes
turbo-like codes
0.112007
Coding for Parallel Channels: Gallager Bounds and Applications to Turbo-Like Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming · 0.3upper bounding · 0.2min-sum algorithm · 0.2belief propagation · 0.2complexity analysis · 0.1probabilistic upper bound · 0.1union bound · 0.1maximum-likelihood decoding · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 The Approximate Maximum-Likelihood Certificate
abstract
The confidence in the reliability of a codeword output by some (not necessarily optimal) decoding algorithm is discussed. A new property which relies on the linear programming (LP) decoder, the approximate maximum-likelihood certificate (AMLC), is introduced to address this issue as follows. First, the channel output vector is decoded by some symmetric decoder D, e.g., belief propagation or min-sum algorithm decoding. Second, the channel output vector is decoded by LP decoding. Third, if the decoding result of D is a codeword, its LP value is compared to the LP value of the LP decoding result (the latter need not be a codeword). If these two values are close, the AMLC holds. Using upper bounding techniques, we show that the conditional frame error probability given that the AMLC holds, is with some degree of confidence below a threshold. In channels with low noise, this threshold is orders of magnitude lower than the simulated frame error rate, and our bound holds with a very high degree of confidence. This is in stark contrast with standard Monte Carlo simulation, which would require excessively long runs to demonstrate like performance. When the AMLC holds, our approach thus provides the decoder with extra error detection capability, which is especially important in applications requiring high data integrity.
Idan Goldenberg, David Burshtein
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2011 Efficient methods for bounding the fractional distance of LDPC codes and obtaining fundamental polytopes of nonbinary and generalized codes
abstract
A method which obtains a tight lower bound on the fractional distance of LDPC codes is proposed. This algorithm exhibits complexity which scales quadratically with the block length, and thus less than currently-known methods. We also show how the fundamental LP polytope for generalized LDPC codes and nonbinary LDPC codes can be obtained.
David Burshtein, Idan Goldenberg
ISIT2
2011 The approximate maximum-likelihood certificate
abstract
A new property which relies on the linear programming (LP) decoder, the approximate maximum-likelihood certificate (AMLC), is introduced. When the belief propagation decoder outputs a codeword, this property is satisfied if this codeword is close to the LP solution. Using upper bounding techniques, it is demonstrated that the conditional frame error probability given that the AMLC holds is, with some degree of confidence, below a threshold. In channels with low noise, this threshold is several orders of magnitude lower than the simulated frame error rate, and our bound holds with very high degree of confidence. In contrast, showing this error performance by simulation would require very long Monte Carlo runs. When the AMLC holds, our approach thus provides the decoder with extra error detection capability, which is especially important in applications requiring high data integrity.
Idan Goldenberg, David Burshtein
ISIT1
2011 Improved Linear Programming Decoding of LDPC Codes and Bounds on the Minimum and Fractional Distance
abstract
We examine LDPC codes decoded using linear programming (LP). Four contributions to the LP framework are presented. First, a new method of tightening the LP relaxation, and thus improving the LP decoder, is proposed. Second, we present an algorithm which calculates a lower bound on the minimum distance of a specific code. This algorithm exhibits complexity which scales quadratically with the block length. Third, we propose a method to obtain a tight lower bound on the fractional distance, also with quadratic complexity, and thus less than previously-existing methods. Finally, we show how the fundamental LP polytope for generalized LDPC codes and nonbinary LDPC codes can be obtained.
David Burshtein, Idan Goldenberg
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2010 Improved linear programming decoding and bounds on the minimum distance of LDPC codes
abstract
We propose a technique for improving LP decoding, based on the merging of check nodes. This technique can be applied to standard as well as generalized LDPC codes. Furthermore, we show how a recently-discovered linear-complexity LP decoder can be used to derive non-trivial lower bounds on the minimum distance of specific LDPC codes, with complexity that exhibits quadratic growth with respect to the block length. This bound can be refined using the check node merging technique. The lower bound on the minimum distance is shown to be an upper bound on the fractional distance of the code.
David Burshtein, Idan Goldenberg
ITW2
2009 Upper bound on error exponent of regular LDPC codes transmitted over the BEC
abstract
The error performance of the ensemble of typical low-definition parity-check (LDPC ) codes transmitted over the binary erasure channel (BEC) is analyzed. In the past, lower bounds on the error exponents were derived. In this paper, a probabilistic upper bound on this error exponent is derived. This bound holds with some confidence level.
Idan Goldenberg, David Burshtein
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2007 Coding for Parallel Channels: Gallager Bounds and Applications to Turbo-Like Codes
abstract
The transmission of coded communication systems is widely modeled to take place over a set of parallel channels. This model is used for transmission over block-fading channels, rate-compatible puncturing of turbo-like codes, multicarrier signaling, multilevel coding, etc. New upper bounds on the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding error probability are derived in the parallel-channel setting. We focus on the generalization of the Gallager-type bounds and discuss the connections between some versions of these bounds. The tightness of these bounds for parallel channels is exemplified for structured ensembles of turbo codes, repeat-accumulate (RA) codes, and some of their recent variations (e.g., punctured accumulate-repeat-accumulate codes). The bounds on the decoding error probability of an ML decoder are compared to computer simulations of iterative decoding. The new bounds show a remarkable improvement over the union bound and some other previously reported bounds for independent parallel channels. This improvement is exemplified for relatively short block lengths, and it is pronounced when the block length is increased. In the asymptotic case, where we let the block length tend to infinity, inner bounds on the attainable channel regions of modern coding techniques under ML decoding are obtained, based solely on the asymptotic growth rates of the average distance spectra of these code ensembles.
Igal Sason, Idan Goldenberg
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2