Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniela Wieser

dblp:11/5838 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration › biological data integration
distributed annotation system
0.112005
Dasty and UniProt DAS: a perfect pair for protein feature visualization · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
hierarchical clustering
0.112005
The predictive power of the CluSTr database · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
protein classification
0.112005
The predictive power of the CluSTr database · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
automatic annotation
0.012005
The predictive power of the CluSTr database · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction
0.012005
The predictive power of the CluSTr database · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
protein sequence annotation
0.012005
Dasty and UniProt DAS: a perfect pair for protein feature visualization · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

smith-waterman algorithm · 0.1single-linkage clustering · 0.1monte carlo analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 On the Importance of Comprehensible Classification Models for Protein Function Prediction
abstract
The literature on protein function prediction is currently dominated by works aimed at maximizing predictive accuracy, ignoring the important issues of validation and interpretation of discovered knowledge, which can lead to new insights and hypotheses that are biologically meaningful and advance the understanding of protein functions by biologists. The overall goal of this paper is to critically evaluate this approach, offering a refreshing new perspective on this issue, focusing not only on predictive accuracy but also on the comprehensibility of the induced protein function prediction models. More specifically, this paper aims to offer two main contributions to the area of protein function prediction. First, it presents the case for discovering comprehensible protein function prediction models from data, discussing in detail the advantages of such models, namely, increasing the confidence of the biologist in the system's predictions, leading to new insights about the data and the formulation of new biological hypotheses, and detecting errors in the data. Second, it presents a critical review of the pros and cons of several different knowledge representations that can be used in order to support the discovery of comprehensible protein function prediction models.
Alex Alves Freitas, Daniela Wieser, Rolf Apweiler
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.2
2008 UniProtJAPI: a remote API for accessing UniProt data
abstract
Programmatic access to the UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) is essential for many bioinformatics applications dealing with protein data. We have created a Java library named UniProtJAPI, which facilitates the integration of UniProt data into Java-based software applications. The library supports queries and similarity searches that return UniProtKB entries in the form of Java objects. These objects contain functional annotations or sequence information associated with a UniProt entry. Here, we briefly describe the UniProtJAPI and demonstrate its usage.
Samuel Patient, Daniela Wieser, Michael Kleen, Ernst Kretschmann, Maria Jesus Martin, Rolf Apweiler
Bioinform.2
2005 Dasty and UniProt DAS: a perfect pair for protein feature visualization
abstract
In this study, we present two freely available and complementary Distributed Annotation System (DAS) resources: a DAS reference server that provides up-to-date sequence and annotation from UniProt, with additional feature links and database cross-references from InterPro and a DAS client implemented using Java and Macromedia Flash that is optimized for the display of protein features.
Philip Jones, Nisha Vinod, Thomas A. Down, Andre Hackmann, Andreas Kähäri, Ernst Kretschmann, Antony F. Quinn, Daniela Wieser, Henning Hermjakob, Rolf Apweiler
Bioinform.8
2005 The predictive power of the CluSTr database
abstract
SUMMARY: The CluSTr database employs a fully automatic single-linkage hierarchical clustering method based on a similarity matrix. In order to compute the matrix, first all-against-all pair-wise comparisons between protein sequences are computed using the Smith-Waterman algorithm. The statistical significance of the similarity scores is then assessed using a Monte Carlo analysis, yielding Z-values, which are used to populate the matrix. This paper describes automated annotation experiments that quantify the predictive power and hence the biological relevance of the CluSTr data. The experiments utilized the UniProt data-mining framework to derive annotation predictions using combinations of InterPro and CluSTr. We show that this combination of data sources greatly increases the precision of predictions made by the data-mining framework, compared with the use of InterPro data alone. We conclude that the CluSTr approach to clustering proteins makes a valuable contribution to traditional protein classifications. AVAILABILITY: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustr/.
Robert Petryszak, Ernst Kretschmann, Daniela Wieser, Rolf Apweiler
Bioinform.3