Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Kondermann

dblp:11/6370 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 13 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Vision and language · 52% 3D vision · 48%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 77% Visualization and visual analytics · 23%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 77% Computational geometry · 23%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal grounding
0.812024
What, When, and Where? Self-Supervised Spatio- Temporal Grounding in Untrimmed Multi-Action Videos from Narrated Instructions · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › video grounding
spatio-temporal grounding
0.812024
What, When, and Where? Self-Supervised Spatio- Temporal Grounding in Untrimmed Multi-Action Videos from Narrated Instructions · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.212015
The HCI Stereo Metrics: Geometry-Aware Performance Analysis of Stereo Algorithms · ICCV 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
stereo matching evaluation
0.212015
The HCI Stereo Metrics: Geometry-Aware Performance Analysis of Stereo Algorithms · ICCV 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › multi-view stereo
stereo reconstruction
0.212015
Reflection Modeling for Passive Stereo · ICCV 2015
Image and video processing › stereo vision
stereo matching
0.212015
Reflection Modeling for Passive Stereo · ICCV 2015
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.212015
The HCI Stereo Metrics: Geometry-Aware Performance Analysis of Stereo Algorithms · ICCV 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
semi-global matching
0.212013
Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
stereo confidence estimation
0.212013
Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
stereo matching
0.212013
Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision
stereo vision
0.212013
Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.112008
On errors-in-variables regression with arbitrary covariance and its application to optical flow estimation · CVPR 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

local representation learning · 0.8global representation encoding · 0.8stacked bar chart · 0.7root mean squared error · 0.7radar chart · 0.7patch match stereo · 0.4least squares model · 0.4random decision forest · 0.2ensemble learning · 0.2gröbner basis · 0.2maximum likelihood estimation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 What, When, and Where? Self-Supervised Spatio- Temporal Grounding in Untrimmed Multi-Action Videos from Narrated Instructions
abstract
Spatio-temporal grounding describes the task of localizing events in space and time, e.g., in video data, based on verbal descriptions only. Models for this task are usually trained with human-annotated sentences and bounding box supervision. This work addresses this task from a multimodal supervision perspective, proposing a framework for spatio-temporal action grounding trained on loose video and subtitle supervision only, without human annotation. To this end, we combine local representation learning, which focuses on leveraging fine-grained spatial information, with a global representation encoding that captures higher-level representations and incorporates both in a joint approach. To evaluate this challenging task in a real-life setting, a new benchmark dataset is proposed, providing dense spatio-temporal grounding annotations in long, untrimmed, multi-action instructional videos for over 5K events. We evaluate the proposed approach and other methods on the proposed and standard downstream tasks, showing that our method improves over current baselines in various settings, including spatial, temporal, and untrimmed multi-action spatio-temporal grounding.
Brian Chen 0001, Nina Shvetsova, Andrew Rouditchenko, Daniel Kondermann, Samuel Thomas 0001, Shih-Fu Chang, Rogério Feris, James R. Glass, Hilde Kuehne
CVPR4
2021 Guest Editorial: Special Issue on Performance Evaluation in Computer Vision
Daniel Scharstein, Angela Dai, Daniel Kondermann, Torsten Sattler, Konrad Schindler
Int. J. Comput. Vis.3
2016 A Dataset and Evaluation Methodology for Depth Estimation on 4D Light Fields
Katrin Honauer, Ole Johannsen, Daniel Kondermann, Bastian Goldlücke
ACCV (3)3
2015 The HCI Stereo Metrics: Geometry-Aware Performance Analysis of Stereo Algorithms
abstract
Performance characterization of stereo methods is mandatory to decide which algorithm is useful for which application. Prevalent benchmarks mainly use the root mean squared error (RMS) with respect to ground truth disparity maps to quantify algorithm performance. We show that the RMS is of limited expressiveness for algorithm selection and introduce the HCI Stereo Metrics. These metrics assess stereo results by harnessing three semantic cues: depth discontinuities, planar surfaces, and fine geometric structures. For each cue, we extract the relevant set of pixels from existing ground truth. We then apply our evaluation functions to quantify characteristics such as edge fattening and surface smoothness. We demonstrate that our approach supports practitioners in selecting the most suitable algorithm for their application. Using the new Middlebury dataset, we show that rankings based on our metrics reveal specific algorithm strengths and weaknesses which are not quantified by existing metrics. We finally show how stacked bar charts and radar charts visually support multidimensional performance evaluation. An interactive stereo benchmark based on the proposed metrics and visualizations is available at: http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/stereometrics.
Katrin Honauer, Lena Maier-Hein, Daniel Kondermann
ICCV3
2015 Reflection Modeling for Passive Stereo
abstract
Stereo reconstruction in presence of reality faces many challenges that still need to be addressed. This paper considers reflections, which introduce incorrect matches due to the observation violating the diffuse-world assumption underlying the majority of stereo techniques. Unlike most existing work, which employ regularization or robust data terms to suppress such errors, we derive two least squares models from first principles that generalize diffuse world stereo and explicitly take reflections into account. These models are parametrized by depth, orientation and material properties, resulting in a total of up to 5 parameters per pixel that have to be estimated. Additionally large non-local interactions between viewed and reflected surface have to be taken into account. These two properties make inference of the model appear prohibitive, but we present evidence that inference is actually possible using a variant of patch match stereo.
Rahul Nair 0006, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, Daniel Kondermann, Carsten Rother
ICCV3
2014 Stereo Ground Truth with Error Bars
Daniel Kondermann, Rahul Nair 0006, Stephan Meister, Wolfgang Mischler, Burkhard Güssefeld, Katrin Honauer, Sabine Hofmann, Claus Brenner, Bernd Jähne
ACCV (5)1
2014 Time of flight motion compensation revisited
abstract
In this paper, we study motion artifacts that arise in Time-ofFlight imaging of dynamic scenes caused by the sequential nature of the raw image acquisition process used to compute the final depth image. Many methods for compensation of such errors have been proposed to date, but still lack a proper comparison. We bridge this gap by not only evaluating those methods, but also by providing implementations for all of them as a base-line to the community. By exchanging the calibration model necessary for these methods with a model closer to reality we were able to improve the results on all related methods without any loss of performance.
Jens-Malte Gottfried, Rahul Nair 0006, Stephan Meister, Christoph S. Garbe, Daniel Kondermann
ICIP5
2014 Are reflectance field renderings appropriate for optical flow evaluation?
abstract
Ground truth generation for optical flow is hard and costly. Real images can be annotated with ground truth optical flow, but two problems persist: first, no flow measurement techniques for dynamic, large-scale data exist. Second, real-world parameters such as weather or surface wetness cannot be systematically varied. On the other hand, rendered images can have perfect ground truth while light, geometry and materials can be systematically varied. But do they resemble reality well enough to serve as a basis for performance evaluation? In this paper, we take computer graphic realism to an extreme: we compare three optical flow results on reflectance field renderings with supposedly identical real images. A systematic variation of reflectance realism reveals that computer graphics are a valid way to create complex synthetic sequences for optical flow evaluation — but only if modeled carefully.
Burkhard Güssefeld, Daniel Kondermann, Christopher Schwartz, Reinhard Klein
ICIP2
2014 Can Masses of Non-Experts Train Highly Accurate Image Classifiers? - A Crowdsourcing Approach to Instrument Segmentation in Laparoscopic Images
Lena Maier-Hein, Sven Mersmann, Daniel Kondermann, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Alexandro Sanchez, Christian Stock, Hannes Kenngott, Matthias Eisenmann, Stefanie Speidel
MICCAI (2)3
2014 Crowdsourcing for Reference Correspondence Generation in Endoscopic Images
Lena Maier-Hein, Sven Mersmann, Daniel Kondermann, Christian Stock, Hannes Kenngott, Alexandro Sanchez, Martin Wagner 0001, Anas Preukschas, Anna-Laura Wekerle, Stefanie Helfert, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Stefanie Speidel
MICCAI (2)3
2013 Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision
abstract
With the aim to improve accuracy of stereo confidence measures, we apply the random decision forest framework to a large set of diverse stereo confidence measures. Learning and testing sets were drawn from the recently introduced KITTI dataset, which currently poses higher challenges to stereo solvers than other benchmarks with ground truth for stereo evaluation. We experiment with semi global matching stereo (SGM) and a census data term, which is the best performing real-time capable stereo method known to date. On KITTI images, SGM still produces a significant amount of error. We obtain consistently improved area under curve values of sparsification measures in comparison to best performing single stereo confidence measures where numbers of stereo errors are large. More specifically, our method performs best in all but one out of 194 frames of the KITTI dataset.
Ralf Haeusler, Rahul Nair 0006, Daniel Kondermann
CVPR3
2013 Is Crowdsourcing for Optical Flow Ground Truth Generation Feasible?
Axel Donath, Daniel Kondermann
ICVS2
2013 When Is a Confidence Measure Good Enough?
Patricia Márquez-Valle, Debora Gil, Aura Hernández-Sabaté, Daniel Kondermann
ICVS4
2008 On errors-in-variables regression with arbitrary covariance and its application to optical flow estimation
abstract
Linear inverse problems in computer vision, including motion estimation, shape fitting and image reconstruction, give rise to parameter estimation problems with highly correlated errors in variables. Established total least squares methods estimate the most likely corrections Acirc and bcirc to a given data matrix [A, b] perturbed by additive Gaussian noise, such that there exists a solution y with [A + Acirc, b +bcirc]y = 0. In practice, regression imposes a more restrictive constraint namely the existence of a solution x with [A + Acirc]x = [b + bcirc]. In addition, more complicated correlations arise canonically from the use of linear filters. We, therefore, propose a maximum likelihood estimator for regression in the general case of arbitrary positive definite covariance matrices. We show that Acirc, bcirc and x can be found simultaneously by the unconstrained minimization of a multivariate polynomial which can, in principle, be carried out by means of a Grobner basis. Results for plane fitting and optical flow computation indicate the superiority of the proposed method.
Bjoern Andres, Claudia Kondermann, Daniel Kondermann, Ullrich Köthe, Fred A. Hamprecht, Christoph S. Garbe
CVPR3