Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Kondermann
dblp:11/6370
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 13 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Vision and language · 52% 3D vision · 48% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 77% Visualization and visual analytics · 23% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 77% Computational geometry · 23% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal grounding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | What, When, and Where? Self-Supervised Spatio- Temporal Grounding in Untrimmed Multi-Action Videos from Narrated Instructions · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › video grounding
spatio-temporal grounding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | What, When, and Where? Self-Supervised Spatio- Temporal Grounding in Untrimmed Multi-Action Videos from Narrated Instructions · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The HCI Stereo Metrics: Geometry-Aware Performance Analysis of Stereo Algorithms · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
stereo matching evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The HCI Stereo Metrics: Geometry-Aware Performance Analysis of Stereo Algorithms · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › multi-view stereo
stereo reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Reflection Modeling for Passive Stereo · ICCV 2015 |
Image and video processing › stereo vision
stereo matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Reflection Modeling for Passive Stereo · ICCV 2015 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The HCI Stereo Metrics: Geometry-Aware Performance Analysis of Stereo Algorithms · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
semi-global matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
stereo confidence estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
stereo matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
stereo vision |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | On errors-in-variables regression with arbitrary covariance and its application to optical flow estimation · CVPR 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
local representation learning · 0.8global representation encoding · 0.8stacked bar chart · 0.7root mean squared error · 0.7radar chart · 0.7patch match stereo · 0.4least squares model · 0.4random decision forest · 0.2ensemble learning · 0.2gröbner basis · 0.2maximum likelihood estimation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | What, When, and Where? Self-Supervised Spatio- Temporal Grounding in Untrimmed Multi-Action Videos from Narrated InstructionsabstractSpatio-temporal grounding describes the task of localizing events in space and time, e.g., in video data, based on verbal descriptions only. Models for this task are usually trained with human-annotated sentences and bounding box supervision. This work addresses this task from a multimodal supervision perspective, proposing a framework for spatio-temporal action grounding trained on loose video and subtitle supervision only, without human annotation. To this end, we combine local representation learning, which focuses on leveraging fine-grained spatial information, with a global representation encoding that captures higher-level representations and incorporates both in a joint approach. To evaluate this challenging task in a real-life setting, a new benchmark dataset is proposed, providing dense spatio-temporal grounding annotations in long, untrimmed, multi-action instructional videos for over 5K events. We evaluate the proposed approach and other methods on the proposed and standard downstream tasks, showing that our method improves over current baselines in various settings, including spatial, temporal, and untrimmed multi-action spatio-temporal grounding. Brian Chen 0001, Nina Shvetsova, Andrew Rouditchenko, Daniel Kondermann, Samuel Thomas 0001, Shih-Fu Chang, Rogério Feris, James R. Glass, Hilde Kuehne |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2021 | Guest Editorial: Special Issue on Performance Evaluation in Computer Vision
Daniel Scharstein, Angela Dai, Daniel Kondermann, Torsten Sattler, Konrad Schindler |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 3 |
| 2016 | A Dataset and Evaluation Methodology for Depth Estimation on 4D Light Fields
Katrin Honauer, Ole Johannsen, Daniel Kondermann, Bastian Goldlücke |
ACCV (3) | 3 |
| 2015 | The HCI Stereo Metrics: Geometry-Aware Performance Analysis of Stereo AlgorithmsabstractPerformance characterization of stereo methods is mandatory to decide which algorithm is useful for which application. Prevalent benchmarks mainly use the root mean squared error (RMS) with respect to ground truth disparity maps to quantify algorithm performance. We show that the RMS is of limited expressiveness for algorithm selection and introduce the HCI Stereo Metrics. These metrics assess stereo results by harnessing three semantic cues: depth discontinuities, planar surfaces, and fine geometric structures. For each cue, we extract the relevant set of pixels from existing ground truth. We then apply our evaluation functions to quantify characteristics such as edge fattening and surface smoothness. We demonstrate that our approach supports practitioners in selecting the most suitable algorithm for their application. Using the new Middlebury dataset, we show that rankings based on our metrics reveal specific algorithm strengths and weaknesses which are not quantified by existing metrics. We finally show how stacked bar charts and radar charts visually support multidimensional performance evaluation. An interactive stereo benchmark based on the proposed metrics and visualizations is available at: http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/stereometrics. Katrin Honauer, Lena Maier-Hein, Daniel Kondermann |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2015 | Reflection Modeling for Passive StereoabstractStereo reconstruction in presence of reality faces many challenges that still need to be addressed. This paper considers reflections, which introduce incorrect matches due to the observation violating the diffuse-world assumption underlying the majority of stereo techniques. Unlike most existing work, which employ regularization or robust data terms to suppress such errors, we derive two least squares models from first principles that generalize diffuse world stereo and explicitly take reflections into account. These models are parametrized by depth, orientation and material properties, resulting in a total of up to 5 parameters per pixel that have to be estimated. Additionally large non-local interactions between viewed and reflected surface have to be taken into account. These two properties make inference of the model appear prohibitive, but we present evidence that inference is actually possible using a variant of patch match stereo. Rahul Nair 0006, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, Daniel Kondermann, Carsten Rother |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2014 | Stereo Ground Truth with Error Bars
Daniel Kondermann, Rahul Nair 0006, Stephan Meister, Wolfgang Mischler, Burkhard Güssefeld, Katrin Honauer, Sabine Hofmann, Claus Brenner, Bernd Jähne |
ACCV (5) | 1 |
| 2014 | Time of flight motion compensation revisitedabstractIn this paper, we study motion artifacts that arise in Time-ofFlight imaging of dynamic scenes caused by the sequential nature of the raw image acquisition process used to compute the final depth image. Many methods for compensation of such errors have been proposed to date, but still lack a proper comparison. We bridge this gap by not only evaluating those methods, but also by providing implementations for all of them as a base-line to the community. By exchanging the calibration model necessary for these methods with a model closer to reality we were able to improve the results on all related methods without any loss of performance. Jens-Malte Gottfried, Rahul Nair 0006, Stephan Meister, Christoph S. Garbe, Daniel Kondermann |
ICIP | 5 |
| 2014 | Are reflectance field renderings appropriate for optical flow evaluation?abstractGround truth generation for optical flow is hard and costly. Real images can be annotated with ground truth optical flow, but two problems persist: first, no flow measurement techniques for dynamic, large-scale data exist. Second, real-world parameters such as weather or surface wetness cannot be systematically varied. On the other hand, rendered images can have perfect ground truth while light, geometry and materials can be systematically varied. But do they resemble reality well enough to serve as a basis for performance evaluation? In this paper, we take computer graphic realism to an extreme: we compare three optical flow results on reflectance field renderings with supposedly identical real images. A systematic variation of reflectance realism reveals that computer graphics are a valid way to create complex synthetic sequences for optical flow evaluation — but only if modeled carefully. Burkhard Güssefeld, Daniel Kondermann, Christopher Schwartz, Reinhard Klein |
ICIP | 2 |
| 2014 | Can Masses of Non-Experts Train Highly Accurate Image Classifiers? - A Crowdsourcing Approach to Instrument Segmentation in Laparoscopic Images
Lena Maier-Hein, Sven Mersmann, Daniel Kondermann, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Alexandro Sanchez, Christian Stock, Hannes Kenngott, Matthias Eisenmann, Stefanie Speidel |
MICCAI (2) | 3 |
| 2014 | Crowdsourcing for Reference Correspondence Generation in Endoscopic Images
Lena Maier-Hein, Sven Mersmann, Daniel Kondermann, Christian Stock, Hannes Kenngott, Alexandro Sanchez, Martin Wagner 0001, Anas Preukschas, Anna-Laura Wekerle, Stefanie Helfert, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Stefanie Speidel |
MICCAI (2) | 3 |
| 2013 | Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo VisionabstractWith the aim to improve accuracy of stereo confidence measures, we apply the random decision forest framework to a large set of diverse stereo confidence measures. Learning and testing sets were drawn from the recently introduced KITTI dataset, which currently poses higher challenges to stereo solvers than other benchmarks with ground truth for stereo evaluation. We experiment with semi global matching stereo (SGM) and a census data term, which is the best performing real-time capable stereo method known to date. On KITTI images, SGM still produces a significant amount of error. We obtain consistently improved area under curve values of sparsification measures in comparison to best performing single stereo confidence measures where numbers of stereo errors are large. More specifically, our method performs best in all but one out of 194 frames of the KITTI dataset. Ralf Haeusler, Rahul Nair 0006, Daniel Kondermann |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2013 | Is Crowdsourcing for Optical Flow Ground Truth Generation Feasible?
Axel Donath, Daniel Kondermann |
ICVS | 2 |
| 2013 | When Is a Confidence Measure Good Enough?
Patricia Márquez-Valle, Debora Gil, Aura Hernández-Sabaté, Daniel Kondermann |
ICVS | 4 |
| 2008 | On errors-in-variables regression with arbitrary covariance and its application to optical flow estimationabstractLinear inverse problems in computer vision, including motion estimation, shape fitting and image reconstruction, give rise to parameter estimation problems with highly correlated errors in variables. Established total least squares methods estimate the most likely corrections Acirc and bcirc to a given data matrix [A, b] perturbed by additive Gaussian noise, such that there exists a solution y with [A + Acirc, b +bcirc]y = 0. In practice, regression imposes a more restrictive constraint namely the existence of a solution x with [A + Acirc]x = [b + bcirc]. In addition, more complicated correlations arise canonically from the use of linear filters. We, therefore, propose a maximum likelihood estimator for regression in the general case of arbitrary positive definite covariance matrices. We show that Acirc, bcirc and x can be found simultaneously by the unconstrained minimization of a multivariate polynomial which can, in principle, be carried out by means of a Grobner basis. Results for plane fitting and optical flow computation indicate the superiority of the proposed method. Bjoern Andres, Claudia Kondermann, Daniel Kondermann, Ullrich Köthe, Fred A. Hamprecht, Christoph S. Garbe |
CVPR | 3 |