Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johan Henckel
dblp:11/7388
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 77% Robot navigation and mapping · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics
surgical robotics |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Active-Constraint Robotics for Surgery · Proc. IEEE 2006 |
Medical and health informatics
computer-assisted surgery |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Active-Constraint Robotics for Surgery · Proc. IEEE 2006 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
surgical navigation |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Active-Constraint Robotics for Surgery · Proc. IEEE 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robotic-assisted surgery · 0.1randomized controlled trial · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Active-Constraint Robotics for SurgeryabstractThe concepts and benefits of hands-on robotic surgery and active-constraint robotics are introduced. The argument is made for systems to be cost effective and simple in order that they can be justified for a large range of surgical procedures. The case is made for robotic systems to have a clear justification, with benefits compared to those from cheaper navigation systems. The need to have robust systems, that require little surgical training and no technical presence in the operating room, is also discussed. An active constraint medical robot, the Acrobot System, is described together with its use in a prospective randomized controlled trial of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), comparing the performance of the Acrobot System with conventional surgery. Twenty-eight patients awaiting UKA were randomly allocated to have the operation performed conventionally or with the assistance of the Acrobot. The results of the trial are presented together with a discussion of the need for measures of accuracy to be introduced so that the efficacy of the robotic surgery can be immediately identified, rather than having to wait for a number of years before long-term clinical improvements can be demonstrated. Brian L. Davies, Matjaz Jakopec, Simon J. Harris, Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena, Adrian R. W. Barrett, A. Evangelidis, Johan Henckel, Justin Cobb |
Proc. IEEE | 8 |