Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Felber
dblp:11/9670
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data stream processing · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data stream processing
distributed monitoring |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Variability in Data Streams · PODS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
relative error estimation · 0.5distributed monitoring · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Variability in Data StreamsabstractWe consider the problem of tracking with small relative error an integer function f(n) defined by a distributed update stream f'(n) in the distributed monitoring model. In this model, there are k sites over which the updates f'(n) are distributed, and they must communicate with a central coordinator to maintain an estimate of f(n). David Felber, Rafail Ostrovsky |
PODS | 1 |
| 2015 | A Randomized Online Quantile Summary in O(1/epsilon * log(1/epsilon)) WordsabstractA quantile summary is a data structure that approximates to epsilon-relative error the order statistics of a much larger underlying dataset. In this paper we develop a randomized online quantile summary for the cash register data input model and comparison data domain model that uses O((1/epsilon) log(1/epsilon)) words of memory. This improves upon the previous best upper bound of O((1/epsilon) (log(1/epsilon))^(3/2)) by Agarwal et al. (PODS 2012). Further, by a lower bound of Hung and Ting (FAW 2010) no deterministic summary for the comparison model can outperform our randomized summary in terms of space complexity. Lastly, our summary has the nice property that O((1/epsilon) log(1/epsilon)) words suffice to ensure that the success probability is 1 - exp(-poly(1/epsilon)). David Felber, Rafail Ostrovsky |
APPROX-RANDOM | 1 |