MOTIVATION: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enables transcriptome-wide profiling at single-cell resolution, revealing heterogeneous regulatory programs and making gene regulatory network (GRN) inference both central and challenging. Recent graph neural network (GNN)-based approaches for GRN inference typically model edges only implicitly (for example, via concatenated node embeddings), which limits their ability to capture complex regulatory dependencies. In addition, distributional shifts across scRNA-seq datasets make a single fixed GNN architecture poorly suited for broad generalization. RESULTS: We present AutoGERN, a GNN framework tailored for GRN inference from scRNA-seq data. AutoGERN explicitly models regulatory information in the message-passing space and learns expressive link (edge) embeddings, which a lightweight multilayer perceptron uses to score gene-gene regulatory associations. To enhance flexibility and representational power, AutoGERN employs dual message-passing spaces (within-layer and cross-layer) and integrates a robust AutoGNN-based architecture search to adapt the network design to differing dataset distributions. Extensive experiments on multiple real scRNA-seq datasets demonstrate that AutoGERN consistently achieves superior performance and robustness compared with state-of-the-art baselines. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and data of AutoGERN are available on GitHub at https://github.com/JChander/AutoGERN and on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18659807.

Reconstructing gene regulatory networks (GRNs) using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data holds great promise for unraveling cellular fate development and heterogeneity. While numerous machine-learning methods have been proposed to infer GRNs from scRNA-seq gene expression data, many of them operate solely in a statistical or black box manner, limiting their capacity for making causal inferences between genes. In this study, we introduce GRN inference with Accuracy and Causal Explanation (GRACE), a novel graph-based causal autoencoder framework that combines a structural causal model (SCM) with graph neural networks (GNNs) to enable GRN inference and gene causal reasoning from scRNA-seq data. By explicitly modeling causal relationships between genes, GRACE facilitates the learning of regulatory context and gene embeddings. With the learned gene signals, our model successfully decoding the causal structures and alleviates the accurate determination of multiple attributes of gene regulation that is important to determine the regulatory levels. Through extensive evaluations on seven benchmarks, we demonstrate that GRACE outperforms 14 state-of-the-art GRN inference methods, with the incorporation of causal mechanisms significantly enhancing the accuracy of GRN and gene causality inference. Furthermore, the application to human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples reveals cell type-specific regulators in monocyte phagocytosis and immune regulation, validated through network analysis and functional enrichment analysis.

The unique expression patterns of circRNAs linked to the advancement and prognosis of cancer underscore their considerable potential as valuable biomarkers. Repurposing existing drugs for new indications can significantly reduce the cost of cancer treatment. Computational prediction of circRNA-cancer and drug-cancer relationships is crucial for precise cancer therapy. However, prior computational methods fail to analyze the interaction between circRNAs, drugs, and cancer at the systematic level. It is essential to propose a method that uncover more valuable information for achieving cancer-centered multi-association prediction. In this paper, we present a novel computational method, AutoEdge-CCP, to unveil cancer-associated circRNAs and drugs. We abstract the complex relationships between circRNAs, drugs, and cancer into a multi-source heterogeneous network. In this network, each molecule is represented by two types information, one is the intrinsic attribute information of molecular features, and the other is the link information explicitly modeled by autoGNN, which searches information from both intra-layer and inter-layer of message passing neural network. The significant performance on multi-scenario applications and case studies establishes AutoEdge-CCP as a potent and promising association prediction tool.

Emerging evidence indicates that circular RNAs (circRNAs) can provide new insights and potential therapeutic targets for disease diagnosis and treatment. However, traditional biological experiments are expensive and time-consuming. Recently, deep learning with a more powerful ability for representation learning enables it to be a promising technology for predicting disease-associated circRNAs. In this review, we mainly introduce the most popular databases related to circRNA, and summarize three types of deep learning-based circRNA-disease associations prediction methods: feature-generation-based, type-discrimination and hybrid-based methods. We further evaluate seven representative models on benchmark with ground truth for both balance and imbalance classification tasks. In addition, we discuss the advantages and limitations of each type of method and highlight suggested applications for future research.

The emergence of single cell RNA sequencing has facilitated the studied of genomes, transcriptomes and proteomes. As available single-cell RNA-seq datasets are released continuously, one of the major challenges facing traditional RNA analysis tools is the high-dimensional, high-sparsity, high-noise and large-scale characteristics of single-cell RNA-seq data. Deep learning technologies match the characteristics of single-cell RNA-seq data perfectly and offer unprecedented promise. Here, we give a systematic review for most popular single-cell RNA-seq analysis methods and tools based on deep learning models, involving the procedures of data preprocessing (quality control, normalization, data correction, dimensionality reduction and data visualization) and clustering task for downstream analysis. We further evaluate the deep model-based analysis methods of data correction and clustering quantitatively on 11 gold standard datasets. Moreover, we discuss the data preferences of these methods and their limitations, and give some suggestions and guidance for users to select appropriate methods and tools.