Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aharon Birnbaum

dblp:116/3017 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 56% Time series and sequential data · 44%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Computational complexity · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › temporal sequence modeling
online sequence prediction
0.112012
Learning the Experts for Online Sequence Prediction · ICML 2012
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.112012
Learning Halfspaces with the Zero-One Loss: Time-Accuracy Tradeoffs · NIPS 2012
Computational complexity › learning theory › boolean function learning
halfspace learning
0.112012
Learning Halfspaces with the Zero-One Loss: Time-Accuracy Tradeoffs · NIPS 2012
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
online learning and no-regret
0.112012
Learning the Experts for Online Sequence Prediction · ICML 2012
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.012012
Learning Halfspaces with the Zero-One Loss: Time-Accuracy Tradeoffs · NIPS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online prediction · 0.3margin theory · 0.3hinge loss · 0.3expert learning · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Learning the Experts for Online Sequence Prediction
Elad Eban, Aharon Birnbaum, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Amir Globerson
ICML2
2012 Learning Halfspaces with the Zero-One Loss: Time-Accuracy Tradeoffs
abstract
Given $\alpha,\epsilon$, we study the time complexity required to improperly learn a halfspace with misclassification error rate of at most $(1+\alpha)\,L^*_\gamma + \epsilon$, where $L^*_\gamma$ is the optimal $\gamma$-margin error rate. For $\alpha = 1/\gamma$, polynomial time and sample complexity is achievable using the hinge-loss. For $\alpha = 0$, \cite{ShalevShSr11} showed that $\poly(1/\gamma)$ time is impossible, while learning is possible in time $\exp(\tilde{O}(1/\gamma))$. An immediate question, which this paper tackles, is what is achievable if $\alpha \in (0,1/\gamma)$. We derive positive results interpolating between the polynomial time for $\alpha = 1/\gamma$ and the exponential time for $\alpha=0$. In particular, we show that there are cases in which $\alpha = o(1/\gamma)$ but the problem is still solvable in polynomial time. Our results naturally extend to the adversarial online learning model and to the PAC learning with malicious noise model.
Aharon Birnbaum, Shai Shalev-Shwartz
NIPS1