Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aharon Birnbaum
dblp:116/3017
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 56% Time series and sequential data · 44% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Computational complexity · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › temporal sequence modeling
online sequence prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning the Experts for Online Sequence Prediction · ICML 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning Halfspaces with the Zero-One Loss: Time-Accuracy Tradeoffs · NIPS 2012 |
Computational complexity › learning theory › boolean function learning
halfspace learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning Halfspaces with the Zero-One Loss: Time-Accuracy Tradeoffs · NIPS 2012 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
online learning and no-regret |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning the Experts for Online Sequence Prediction · ICML 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Learning Halfspaces with the Zero-One Loss: Time-Accuracy Tradeoffs · NIPS 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online prediction · 0.3margin theory · 0.3hinge loss · 0.3expert learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Learning the Experts for Online Sequence Prediction
Elad Eban, Aharon Birnbaum, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Amir Globerson |
ICML | 2 |
| 2012 | Learning Halfspaces with the Zero-One Loss: Time-Accuracy TradeoffsabstractGiven $\alpha,\epsilon$, we study the time complexity required to improperly learn a halfspace with misclassification error rate of at most $(1+\alpha)\,L^*_\gamma + \epsilon$, where $L^*_\gamma$ is the optimal $\gamma$-margin error rate. For $\alpha = 1/\gamma$, polynomial time and sample complexity is achievable using the hinge-loss. For $\alpha = 0$, \cite{ShalevShSr11} showed that $\poly(1/\gamma)$ time is impossible, while learning is possible in time $\exp(\tilde{O}(1/\gamma))$. An immediate question, which this paper tackles, is what is achievable if $\alpha \in (0,1/\gamma)$. We derive positive results interpolating between the polynomial time for $\alpha = 1/\gamma$ and the exponential time for $\alpha=0$. In particular, we show that there are cases in which $\alpha = o(1/\gamma)$ but the problem is still solvable in polynomial time. Our results naturally extend to the adversarial online learning model and to the PAC learning with malicious noise model. Aharon Birnbaum, Shai Shalev-Shwartz |
NIPS | 1 |