EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan Bischof
dblp:116/3074 · also Jonathan M. Bischof
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 81% Language models and text generation · 19% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 50% Information retrieval · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › deep learning systems
deep learning framework |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | KerasCV and KerasNLP: Multi-framework Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | KerasCV and KerasNLP: Multi-framework Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
pretrained vision models |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | KerasCV and KerasNLP: Multi-framework Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Information retrieval
text analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Capturing topical content with frequency and exclusivity · ICML 2012 |
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Capturing topical content with frequency and exclusivity · ICML 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 0.8XLA compilation · 0.8topic modeling · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | KerasCV and KerasNLP: Multi-framework ModelsabstractWe present the Keras domain packages KerasCV and KerasNLP, extensions of the Keras API for Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing workflows, capable of running on either JAX, TensorFlow, or PyTorch. These domain packages are designed to enable fast experimentation, with a focus on ease-of-use and performance. We adopt a modular, layered design: at the library's lowest level of abstraction, we provide building blocks for creating models and data preprocessing pipelines, and at the library's highest level of abstraction, we provide pretrained "task" models for popular architectures such as Stable Diffusion, YOLOv8, GPT2, BERT, Mistral, CLIP, Gemma, T5, etc. Task models have built-in preprocessing, pretrained weights, and can be fine-tuned on raw inputs. To enable efficient training, we support XLA compilation for all models, and run all preprocessing via a compiled graph of TensorFlow operations using the tf.data API. The libraries are fully open-source (Apache 2.0 license) and available on GitHub. Keywords: KerasCV, KerasNLP, Keras multi-backend, Deep learning, Generative AI Divyashree Shivakumar Sreepathihalli, François Chollet, Martin Görner, Kiranbir Sodhia, Ramesh Sampath, Tirth Patel, Hai Jin 0001, Neel Kovelamudi, Gabriel Rasskin, Samaneh Saadat, Luke Wood, Jonathan Bischof, Ian Stenbit, Abheesht Sharma, Anshuman Mishra |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 14 |
| 2019 | Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and ImprovementsabstractAs more researchers have become aware of and passionate about algorithmic fairness, there has been an explosion in papers laying out new metrics, suggesting algorithms to address issues, and calling attention to issues in existing applications of machine learning. This research has greatly expanded our understanding of the concerns and challenges in deploying machine learning, but there has been much less work in seeing how the rubber meets the road. In this paper we provide a case-study on the application of fairness in machine learning research to a production classification system, and offer new insights in how to measure and address algorithmic fairness issues. We discuss open questions in implementing equality of opportunity and describe our fairness metric, conditional equality, that takes into account distributional differences. Further, we provide a new approach to improve on the fairness metric during model training and demonstrate its efficacy in improving performance for a real-world product. Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Tulsee Doshi, Hai Qian, Allison Woodruff, Christine Luu, Pierre Kreitmann, Jonathan Bischof, Ed H. Chi |
AIES | 8 |
| 2012 | Capturing topical content with frequency and exclusivity
Jonathan Bischof, Edoardo M. Airoldi |
ICML | 1 |