Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim Villabona
dblp:116/6459
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 12% Robot manipulation · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Dominant sources of variability in passive walking · ICRA 2012 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
passive dynamic walking |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Dominant sources of variability in passive walking · ICRA 2012 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › contact modeling
collision dynamics |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Dominant sources of variability in passive walking · ICRA 2012 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot dynamics |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Dominant sources of variability in passive walking · ICRA 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic modeling · 0.1numerical simulation · 0.1motion capture · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Dominant sources of variability in passive walkingabstractThis paper investigates possible sources of variability in the dynamics of legged locomotion, even in its most idealized form. The rimless wheel model is a seemingly deterministic legged dynamic system, popular within the legged locomotion community for understanding basic collision dynamics and energetics during passive phases of walking. Despite the simplicity of this legged model, however, experimental motion capture data recording the passive step-to-step dynamics of a rimless wheel down a constant-slope terrain actually demonstrate significant variability, providing strong evidence that stochasticity is an intrinsic-and thus unavoidable-property of legged locomotion that should be modeled with care when designing reliable walking machines. We present numerical comparisons of several hypotheses as to the dominant source(s) of this variability: 1) the initial distribution of the angular velocity, 2) the uneven profile of the leg lengths and 3) the distribution of the coefficients of friction and restitution across collisions. Our analysis shows that the 3rd hypothesis most accurately predicts the noise characteristics observed in our experimental data while the 1st hypothesis is also valid for certain contexts of terrain friction. These findings suggest that variability due to ground contact dynamics, and not simply due to geometric variations more typically modeled in terrain, is important in determining the stochasticity and resulting stability of walking robots. Although such ground contact variability might be an expected result in field robotics on significantly rough terrain, we again note our experimental data applies seemingly deterministic-looking terrains: our results suggest that stochastic ground collision models should play an important role in the analysis and optimization of dynamic performance and stability in robot walking. D. P. Thrishantha Nanayakkara, Katie Byl, Hongbin Liu 0001, Xiaojing Song, Tim Villabona |
ICRA | 5 |