Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nikki Holland

dblp:116/6678 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education
software engineering education
0.112012
What scope is there for adopting evidence-informed teaching in SE? · ICSE 2012
Empirical software engineering
evidence-based software engineering
0.112012
What scope is there for adopting evidence-informed teaching in SE? · ICSE 2012
Empirical software engineering
systematic literature review
0.112012
What scope is there for adopting evidence-informed teaching in SE? · ICSE 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systematic literature review · 0.3mapping study · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 What scope is there for adopting evidence-informed teaching in SE?
abstract
Context: In teaching about software engineering we currently make little use of any empirical knowledge. Aim: To examine the outcomes available from the use of Evidence-Based Software Engineering (EBSE) practices, so as to identify where these can provide support for, and inform, teaching activities. Method: We have examined all known secondary studies published up to the end of 2009, together with those published in major journals to mid-2011, and identified where these provide practical results that are relevant to student needs. Results: Starting with 145 candidate systematic literature reviews (SLRs), we were able to identify and classify potentially useful teaching material from 43 of them. Conclusions: EBSE can potentially lend authority to our teaching, although the coverage of key topics is uneven. Additionally, mapping studies can provide support for research-led teaching.
David Budgen, Sarah Drummond, Pearl Brereton, Nikki Holland
ICSE4