Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael R. Glass
dblp:116/9328 · also Michael Robert Glass
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
8as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 6 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 41% Question answering and dialogue systems · 16% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 78% Knowledge graphs · 22% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Learning to Transfer Relational Representations through Analogy · AAAI 2019 Discovering Implicit Knowledge with Unary Relations · ACL (1) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Retrieval Augmented Generation for Zero-shot Slot Filling · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
slot filling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Retrieval Augmented Generation for Zero-shot Slot Filling · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Translucent Answer Predictions in Multi-Hop Reading Comprehension · AAAI 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
multi-hop reading comprehension |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Translucent Answer Predictions in Multi-Hop Reading Comprehension · AAAI 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
reading comprehension question answering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Translucent Answer Predictions in Multi-Hop Reading Comprehension · AAAI 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
span selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Span Selection Pre-training for Question Answering · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › structured representation learning
relational representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning to Transfer Relational Representations through Analogy · AAAI 2019 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scalable Hierarchical Clustering with Tree Grafting · KDD 2019 |
Data mining › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scalable Hierarchical Clustering with Tree Grafting · KDD 2019 |
Data mining › clustering
online clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scalable Hierarchical Clustering with Tree Grafting · KDD 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
implicit relation extraction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Discovering Implicit Knowledge with Unary Relations · ACL (1) 2018 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge base population |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Discovering Implicit Knowledge with Unary Relations · ACL (1) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › bayesian latent variable model
bayesian tensor decomposition |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Word Semantic Representations using Bayesian Probabilistic Tensor Factorization · EMNLP 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
lexical substitution |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Lexical Substitution for the Medical Domain · EMNLP 2014 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Word Semantic Representations using Bayesian Probabilistic Tensor Factorization · EMNLP 2014 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Word Semantic Representations using Bayesian Probabilistic Tensor Factorization · EMNLP 2014 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Retrieval Augmented Generation for Zero-shot Slot Filling · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Learning to Transfer Relational Representations through Analogy · AAAI 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
learning by reading |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned · AAAI 2007 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge base construction |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned · AAAI 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zero-shot learning · 0.5hard negative mining · 0.5few-shot learning · 0.5dense passage retrieval · 0.5supporting fact prediction · 0.4pre-training · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4siamese network · 0.4rotate and graft · 0.4linkage functions · 0.4distant supervision · 0.4analogy-based learning · 0.4deep learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | When Text-to-SQL Evaluation Misleads: Rethinking Benchmarking Practices
Oktie Hassanzadeh, Yotam Perlitz, Nhan Pham, Timothy Dinger, Tanvi Kaple, Long Hai Vu, Michael R. Glass, Dharmashankar Subramanian |
ICDE | 7 |
| 2025 | The Consistency Hypothesis in Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language ModelsabstractEstimating the confidence of large language model (LLM) outputs is essential for real-world applications requiring high user trust. Black-box uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods, relying solely on model API access, have gained popularity due to their practical benefits. In this paper, we examine the implicit assumption behind several UQ methods, which use generation consistency as a proxy for confidence-an idea we formalize as the consistency hypothesis. We introduce three mathematical statements with corresponding statistical tests to capture variations of this hypothesis and metrics to evaluate LLM output conformity across tasks. Our empirical investigation, spanning 8 benchmark datasets and 3 tasks (question answering, text summarization, and text-to-SQL), highlights the prevalence of the hypothesis under different settings. Among the statements, we highlight the ‘Sim-Any’ hypothesis as the most actionable, and demonstrate how it can be leveraged by proposing data-free black-box UQ methods that aggregate similarities between generations for confidence estimation. These approaches can outperform the closest baselines, showcasing the practical value of the empirically observed consistency hypothesis. Quan Xiao, Debarun Bhattacharjya, Balaji Ganesan, Radu Marinescu 0002, Katsiaryna Mirylenka, Nhan H. Pham, Michael R. Glass, Junkyu Lee 0001 |
UAI | 7 |
| 2022 | Re2G: Retrieve, Rerank, GenerateabstractMichael Glass, Gaetano Rossiello, Md Faisal Mahbub Chowdhury, Ankita Naik, Pengshan Cai, Alfio Gliozzo. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Michael R. Glass, Gaetano Rossiello, Md. Faisal Mahbub Chowdhury, Ankita Naik, Pengshan Cai, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2021 | Robust Retrieval Augmented Generation for Zero-shot Slot FillingabstractAutomatically inducing high quality knowledge graphs from a given collection of documents still remains a challenging problem in AI.One way to make headway for this problem is through advancements in a related task known as slot filling.In this task, given an entity query in form of [ENTITY, SLOT, ?], a system is asked to 'fill' the slot by generating or extracting the missing value exploiting evidence extracted from relevant passage(s) in the given document collection.The recent works in the field try to solve this task in an end-to-end fashion using retrieval-based language models.In this paper, we present a novel approach to zero-shot slot filling that extends dense passage retrieval with hard negatives and robust training procedures for retrieval augmented generation models.Our model reports large improvements on both T-REx and zsRE slot filling datasets, improving both passage retrieval and slot value generation, and ranking at the top-1 position in the KILT leaderboard.Moreover, we demonstrate the robustness of our system showing its domain adaptation capability on a new variant of the TACRED dataset for slot filling, through a combination of zero/few-shot learning.We release the source code and pre-trained models 1 . Michael R. Glass, Gaetano Rossiello, Md. Faisal Mahbub Chowdhury, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | Capturing Row and Column Semantics in Transformer Based Question Answering over TablesabstractMichael Glass, Mustafa Canim, Alfio Gliozzo, Saneem Chemmengath, Vishwajeet Kumar, Rishav Chakravarti, Avi Sil, Feifei Pan, Samarth Bharadwaj, Nicolas Rodolfo Fauceglia. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. Michael R. Glass, Mustafa Canim, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo, Saneem A. Chemmengath, Vishwajeet Kumar, Rishav Chakravarti, Avirup Sil, Feifei Pan 0002, Samarth Bharadwaj, Nicolas R. Fauceglia |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2020 | Translucent Answer Predictions in Multi-Hop Reading ComprehensionabstractResearch on the task of Reading Comprehension style Question Answering (RCQA) has gained momentum in recent years due to the emergence of human annotated datasets and associated leaderboards, for example CoQA, HotpotQA, SQuAD, TriviaQA, etc. While state-of-the-art has advanced considerably, there is still ample opportunity to advance it further on some important variants of the RCQA task. In this paper, we propose a novel deep neural architecture, called TAP (Translucent Answer Prediction), to identify answers and evidence (in the form of supporting facts) in an RCQA task requiring multi-hop reasoning. TAP comprises two loosely coupled networks – Local and Global Interaction eXtractor (LoGIX) and Answer Predictor (AP). LoGIX predicts supporting facts, whereas AP consumes these predicted supporting facts to predict the answer span. The novel design of LoGIX is inspired by two key design desiderata – local context and global interaction– that we identified by analyzing examples of multi-hop RCQA task. The loose coupling between LoGIX and the AP reveals the set of sentences used by the AP in predicting an answer. Therefore, answer predictions of TAP can be interpreted in a translucent manner. TAP offers state-of-the-art performance on the HotpotQA (Yang et al. 2018) dataset – an apt dataset for multi-hop RCQA task – as it occupies Rank-1 on its leaderboard (https://hotpotqa.github.io/) at the time of submission. G. P. Shrivatsa Bhargav, Michael R. Glass, Dinesh Garg, Shirish K. Shevade, Saswati Dana, Dinesh Khandelwal, L. Venkata Subramaniam, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Span Selection Pre-training for Question AnsweringabstractMichael Glass, Alfio Gliozzo, Rishav Chakravarti, Anthony Ferritto, Lin Pan, G P Shrivatsa Bhargav, Dinesh Garg, Avi Sil. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2020. Michael R. Glass, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo, Rishav Chakravarti, Anthony Ferritto, Lin Pan 0003, G. P. Shrivatsa Bhargav, Dinesh Garg, Avirup Sil |
ACL | 1 |
| 2019 | Learning to Transfer Relational Representations through AnalogyabstractWe propose a novel approach to learn representations of relations expressed by their textual mentions. In our assumption, if two pairs of entities belong to the same relation, then those two pairs are analogous. We collect a large set of analogous pairs by matching triples in knowledge bases with web-scale corpora through distant supervision. This dataset is adopted to train a hierarchical siamese network in order to learn entity-entity embeddings which encode relational information through the different linguistic paraphrasing expressing the same relation. The model can be used to generate pre-trained embeddings which provide a valuable signal when integrated into an existing neural-based model by outperforming the state-of-the-art methods on a relation extraction task. Gaetano Rossiello, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo, Michael R. Glass |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2019 | Scalable Hierarchical Clustering with Tree GraftingabstractWe introduce Grinch, a new algorithm for large-scale, non-greedy hierarchical clustering with general linkage functions that compute arbitrary similarity between two point sets. The key components of Grinch are its rotate and graft subroutines that efficiently reconfigure the hierarchy as new points arrive, supporting discovery of clusters with complex structure. Grinch is motivated by a new notion of separability for clustering with linkage functions: we prove that when the linkage function is consistent with a ground-truth clustering, Grinch is guaranteed to produce a cluster tree containing the ground-truth, independent of data arrival order. Our empirical results on benchmark and author coreference datasets (with standard and learned linkage functions) show that Grinch is more accurate than other scalable methods, and orders of magnitude faster than hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Nicholas Monath, Ari Kobren, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Michael R. Glass, Andrew McCallum |
KDD | 4 |
| 2018 | Discovering Implicit Knowledge with Unary RelationsabstractState-of-the-art relation extraction ap-proaches are only able to recognize relationships between mentions of entity arguments stated explicitly in the text and typically localized to the same sentence.However, the vast majority of relations are either implicit or not sententially localized.This is a major problem for Knowledge Base Population, severely limiting recall.In this paper we propose a new methodology to identify relations between two entities, consisting of detecting a very large number of unary relations, and using them to infer missing entities.We describe a deep learning architecture able to learn thousands of such relations very efficiently by using a common deep learning based representation.Our approach largely outperforms state of the art relation extraction technology on a newly introduced web scale knowledge base population benchmark, that we release to the research community. Michael R. Glass, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | A Dataset for Web-Scale Knowledge Base Population
Michael R. Glass, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo |
ESWC | 1 |
| 2018 | Inducing Implicit Relations from Text Using Distantly Supervised Deep Nets
Michael R. Glass, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo, Oktie Hassanzadeh, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Gaetano Rossiello |
ISWC (1) | 1 |
| 2015 | Applying deep learning to answer selection: A study and an open taskabstractWe apply a general deep learning framework to address the non-factoid question answering task. Our approach does not rely on any linguistic tools and can be applied to different languages or domains. Various architectures are presented and compared. We create and release a QA corpus and setup a new QA task in the insurance domain. Experimental results demonstrate superior performance compared to the baseline methods and various technologies give further improvements. For this highly challenging task, the top-1 accuracy can reach up to 65.3% on a test set, which indicates a great potential for practical use. Minwei Feng, Bing Xiang, Michael R. Glass, Bowen Zhou 0006 |
ASRU | 3 |
| 2014 | Lexical Substitution for the Medical DomainabstractIn this paper we examine the lexical substitu-tion task for the medical domain. We adapt the current best system from the open domain, which trains a single classifier for all instances using delexicalized features. We show sig-nificant improvements over a strong baseline coming from a distributional thesaurus (DT). Whereas in the open domain system, features derived from WordNet show only slight im-provements, we show that its counterpart for the medical domain (UMLS) shows a signif-icant additional benefit when used for feature generation. 1 Martin Riedl 0002, Michael R. Glass, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2014 | Word Semantic Representations using Bayesian Probabilistic Tensor FactorizationabstractMany forms of word relatedness have been developed, providing different perspec-tives on word similarity. We introduce a Bayesian probabilistic tensor factoriza-tion model for synthesizing a single word vector representation and per-perspective linear transformations from any number of word similarity matrices. The result-ing word vectors, when combined with the per-perspective linear transformation, ap-proximately recreate while also regulariz-ing and generalizing, each word similarity perspective. Our method can combine manually cre-ated semantic resources with neural word embeddings to separate synonyms and antonyms, and is capable of generaliz-ing to words outside the vocabulary of any particular perspective. We evaluated the word embeddings with GRE antonym questions, the result achieves the state-of-the-art performance. 1 Jeremy Salwen, Michael R. Glass, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2012 | Structured Term Recognition in Medical Text
Michael R. Glass, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo |
COLING | 1 |
| 2007 | Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned
Ken Barker 0002, Bhalchandra Agashe, Shaw Yi Chaw, James Fan, Noah S. Friedland, Michael R. Glass, Jerry R. Hobbs, Eduard H. Hovy, David J. Israel, Doo Soon Kim, Rutu Mulkar-Mehta, Sourabh Patwardhan, Bruce W. Porter, Dan Tecuci, Peter Z. Yeh |
AAAI | 6 |