Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alireza Bakhtiari

dblp:116/9393 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 68% Learning theory · 32%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
1.122025
Thompson Sampling for Bandit Convex Optimisation · COLT 2025
Eluder dimension: localise it! · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
eluder dimension
0.912025
Eluder dimension: localise it! · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regret minimization
first-order regret bounds
0.912025
Eluder dimension: localise it! · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › parametric bandits
generalized linear bandits
0.912025
Thompson Sampling for Bandit Convex Optimisation · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.912025
Eluder dimension: localise it! · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling
0.912025
Thompson Sampling for Bandit Convex Optimisation · COLT 2025
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
bandit convex optimization
0.912025
Thompson Sampling for Bandit Convex Optimisation · COLT 2025
Mathematical optimization
online optimization
0.912025
Thompson Sampling for Bandit Convex Optimisation · COLT 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian regret analysis · 1.7information-theoretic lower bounds · 0.9information-theoretic lower bound · 0.9generalized linear model · 0.9eluder dimension localization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Thompson Sampling for Bandit Convex Optimisation
abstract
We show that Thompson sampling has a Bayesian regret of at most $\tilde O(\sqrt{n})$ for $1$-dimensional bandit convex optimisation where $n$ is the time horizon and no assumptions are made on the loss function beyond convexity, boundedness and a mild Lipschitz assumption. For general high-dimensional problems we show that Thompson sampling can fail catastrophically. More positively, we show that Thompson sampling has Bayesian regret of $\tilde O(d^{2.5} \sqrt{n})$ for generalised linear bandits with an unknown convex monotone link function. Lastly, we prove that the standard information-theoretic machinery can never give a bound on the regret in the general case that improveson the best known bound of $\tilde O(d^{1.5} \sqrt{n})$.
Alireza Bakhtiari, Tor Lattimore, Csaba Szepesvári
COLT1
2025 Eluder dimension: localise it!
abstract
We establish a lower bound on the eluder dimension in generalised linear model classes, showing that standard eluder dimension-based analysis cannot lead to first-order regret bounds. To address this, we introduce a localisation method for the eluder dimension; our analysis immediately recovers and improves on classic results for Bernoulli bandits, and allows for the first genuine first-order bounds for finite-horizon reinforcement learning tasks with bounded cumulative returns.
Alireza Bakhtiari, Alex Ayoub, Samuel Robertson, David Janz, Csaba Szepesvári
NeurIPS1