Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Brunkhorst

dblp:116/9503 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
functional module identification
0.112012
Robustness and accuracy of functional modules in integrated network analysis · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network
network biology
0.112012
Robustness and accuracy of functional modules in integrated network analysis · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012012
Robustness and accuracy of functional modules in integrated network analysis · Bioinform. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

jackknife resampling · 0.1consensus approach · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Robustness and accuracy of functional modules in integrated network analysis
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput molecular data provide a wealth of information that can be integrated into network analysis. Several approaches exist that identify functional modules in the context of integrated biological networks. The objective of this study is 2-fold: first, to assess the accuracy and variability of identified modules and second, to develop an algorithm for deriving highly robust and accurate solutions. RESULTS: In a comparative simulation study accuracy and robustness of the proposed and established methodologies are validated, considering various sources of variation in the data. To assess this variation, we propose a jackknife resampling procedure resulting in an ensemble of optimal modules. A consensus approach summarizes the ensemble into one final module containing maximally robust nodes and edges. The resulting consensus module identifies and visualizes robust and variable regions by assigning support values to nodes and edges. Finally, the proposed approach is exemplified on two large gene expression studies: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Daniela Beisser, Stefan Brunkhorst, Thomas Dandekar, Gunnar W. Klau, Marcus T. Dittrich, Tobias Müller 0001
Bioinform.2