Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stefan Brunkhorst
dblp:116/9503
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
functional module identification |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Robustness and accuracy of functional modules in integrated network analysis · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network
network biology |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Robustness and accuracy of functional modules in integrated network analysis · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Robustness and accuracy of functional modules in integrated network analysis · Bioinform. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
jackknife resampling · 0.1consensus approach · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Robustness and accuracy of functional modules in integrated network analysisabstractMOTIVATION: High-throughput molecular data provide a wealth of information that can be integrated into network analysis. Several approaches exist that identify functional modules in the context of integrated biological networks. The objective of this study is 2-fold: first, to assess the accuracy and variability of identified modules and second, to develop an algorithm for deriving highly robust and accurate solutions. RESULTS: In a comparative simulation study accuracy and robustness of the proposed and established methodologies are validated, considering various sources of variation in the data. To assess this variation, we propose a jackknife resampling procedure resulting in an ensemble of optimal modules. A consensus approach summarizes the ensemble into one final module containing maximally robust nodes and edges. The resulting consensus module identifies and visualizes robust and variable regions by assigning support values to nodes and edges. Finally, the proposed approach is exemplified on two large gene expression studies: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Daniela Beisser, Stefan Brunkhorst, Thomas Dandekar, Gunnar W. Klau, Marcus T. Dittrich, Tobias Müller 0001 |
Bioinform. | 2 |