Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Minako Nakamura

dblp:117/0034 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Robot manipulation · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
learning from observation
0.312018
Describing Upper-Body Motions Based on Labanotation for Learning-from-Observation Robots · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot programming
task specification
0.312018
Describing Upper-Body Motions Based on Labanotation for Learning-from-Observation Robots · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

labanotation · 0.7key-frame pose extraction · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Describing Upper-Body Motions Based on Labanotation for Learning-from-Observation Robots
abstract
We have been developing a paradigm that we call learning-from-observation for a robot to automatically acquire a robot program to conduct a series of operations, or for a robot to understand what to do, through observing humans performing the same operations. Since a simple mimicking method to repeat exact joint angles or exact end-effector trajectories does not work well because of the kinematic and dynamic differences between a human and a robot, the proposed method employs intermediate symbolic representations, tasks, for conceptually representing what-to-do through observation. These tasks are subsequently mapped to appropriate robot operations depending on the robot hardware. In the present work, task models for upper-body operations of humanoid robots are presented, which are designed on the basis of Labanotation. Given a series of human operations, we first analyze the upper-body motions and extract certain fixed poses from key frames. These key poses are translated into tasks represented by Labanotation symbols. Then, a robot performs the operations corresponding to those task models. Because tasks based on Labanotation are independent of robot hardware, different robots can share the same observation module, and only different task-mapping modules specific to robot hardware are required. The system was implemented and demonstrated that three different robots can automatically mimic human upper-body operations with a satisfactory level of resemblance.
Katsushi Ikeuchi, Zhaoyuan Ma, Zengqiang Yan, Shunsuke Kudoh, Minako Nakamura
Int. J. Comput. Vis.5
2015 GenLaban: A tool for generating Labanotation from motion capture data
Worawat Choensawat, Minako Nakamura, Kozaburo Hachimura
Multim. Tools Appl.2