Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Klas E. G. Magnusson
dblp:117/0329
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-5329-575XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 56% Medical and health informatics · 44% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless networking · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking › multiple access protocols
multiaccess scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimal Scheduling for Interference Mitigation by Range Information · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
cell tracking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms · Bioinform. 2014 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
cell segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.3multi-objective optimization · 0.3performance evaluation · 0.2benchmarking · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Optimal Scheduling for Interference Mitigation by Range InformationabstractThe multiple access scheduling decides how the channel is shared among the nodes in the network. Typically scheduling algorithms aims at increasing the channel utilization and thereby throughput of the network. This paper describes several algorithms for generating an optimal schedule in terms of channel utilization for multiple access by utilizing range information in a fully connected network. We also provide detailed analysis for the proposed algorithms performance in terms of their complexity, convergence, and effect of non-idealities in the network. The performance of the proposed schemes are compared with non-aided methods to quantify the benefits of using the range information in the communication. The proposed methods have several favorable properties for the scalable systems. We show that the proposed techniques yields better channel utilization and throughput as the number of nodes in the network increases. We provide simulation results in support of this claim. The proposed methods indicate that the throughput can be increased on average by 3-10 times for typical network configurations. Vijaya Yajnanarayana, Klas E. G. Magnusson, Rasmus Brandt, Satyam Dwivedi, Peter Händel |
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. | 2 |
| 2015 | Global Linking of Cell Tracks Using the Viterbi AlgorithmabstractAutomated tracking of living cells in microscopy image sequences is an important and challenging problem. With this application in mind, we propose a global track linking algorithm, which links cell outlines generated by a segmentation algorithm into tracks. The algorithm adds tracks to the image sequence one at a time, in a way which uses information from the complete image sequence in every linking decision. This is achieved by finding the tracks which give the largest possible increases to a probabilistically motivated scoring function, using the Viterbi algorithm. We also present a novel way to alter previously created tracks when new tracks are created, thus mitigating the effects of error propagation. The algorithm can handle mitosis, apoptosis, and migration in and out of the imaged area, and can also deal with false positives, missed detections, and clusters of jointly segmented cells. The algorithm performance is demonstrated on two challenging datasets acquired using bright-field microscopy, but in principle, the algorithm can be used with any cell type and any imaging technique, presuming there is a suitable segmentation algorithm. Klas E. G. Magnusson, Joakim Jaldén, Penney M. Gilbert, Helen M. Blau |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 1 |
| 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithmsabstractMOTIVATION: Automatic tracking of cells in multidimensional time-lapse fluorescence microscopy is an important task in many biomedical applications. A novel framework for objective evaluation of cell tracking algorithms has been established under the auspices of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2013 Cell Tracking Challenge. In this article, we present the logistics, datasets, methods and results of the challenge and lay down the principles for future uses of this benchmark. RESULTS: The main contributions of the challenge include the creation of a comprehensive video dataset repository and the definition of objective measures for comparison and ranking of the algorithms. With this benchmark, six algorithms covering a variety of segmentation and tracking paradigms have been compared and ranked based on their performance on both synthetic and real datasets. Given the diversity of the datasets, we do not declare a single winner of the challenge. Instead, we present and discuss the results for each individual dataset separately. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The challenge Web site (http://www.codesolorzano.com/celltrackingchallenge) provides access to the training and competition datasets, along with the ground truth of the training videos. It also provides access to Windows and Linux executable files of the evaluation software and most of the algorithms that competed in the challenge. Martin Maska, Vladimír Ulman, David Svoboda, Pavel Matula, Petr Matula, Cristina Ederra, Ainhoa Urbiola, Tomás España, Subramanian Venkatesan 0001, Deepak M. W. Balak, Pavel Karas, Tereza Bolcková, Markéta Streitová, Craig Carthel, Stefano Coraluppi, Nathalie Harder, Karl Rohr, Klas E. G. Magnusson, Joakim Jaldén, Helen M. Blau, Oleh Dzyubachyk, Pavel Krízek, Guy M. Hagen, David Pastor-Escuredo, Daniel Jimenez-Carretero, María J. Ledesma-Carbayo, Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia, Erik Meijering, Michal Kozubek 0001, Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano |
Bioinform. | 18 |