Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Borowsky
dblp:117/0465
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › medical image analysis
histology image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Stacked Predictive Sparse Decomposition for Classification of Histology Sections · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Stacked Predictive Sparse Decomposition for Classification of Histology Sections · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015 |
Medical and health informatics
computational pathology |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Classification of Tumor Histology via Morphometric Context · CVPR 2013 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Classification of Tumor Histology via Morphometric Context · CVPR 2013 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › feature extraction
spatial pyramid matching |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Classification of Tumor Histology via Morphometric Context · CVPR 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse representation · 0.3morphometric features · 0.3stacked predictive sparse decomposition · 0.2deep learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | When machine vision meets histology: A comparative evaluation of model architecture for classification of histology sections
Ju Han, Alexander Borowsky, Bahram Parvin, Yunfu Wang, Hang Chang |
Medical Image Anal. | 3 |
| 2016 | Integrative Analysis of Cellular Morphometric Context Reveals Clinically Relevant Signatures in Lower Grade Glioma
Ju Han, Yunfu Wang, Tom Weidong Cai, Alexander Borowsky, Bahram Parvin, Hang Chang |
MICCAI (1) | 4 |
| 2015 | Stacked Predictive Sparse Decomposition for Classification of Histology Sections
Hang Chang, Alexander Borowsky, Kenneth E. Barner, Paul T. Spellman, Bahram Parvin |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 3 |
| 2013 | Classification of Tumor Histology via Morphometric ContextabstractImage-based classification of tissue histology, in terms of different components (e.g., normal signature, categories of aberrant signatures), provides a series of indices for tumor composition. Subsequently, aggregation of these indices in each whole slide image (WSI) from a large cohort can provide predictive models of clinical outcome. However, the performance of the existing techniques is hindered as a result of large technical and biological variations that are always present in a large cohort. In this paper, we propose two algorithms for classification of tissue histology based on robust representations of morphometric context, which are built upon nuclear level morphometric features at various locations and scales within the spatial pyramid matching (SPM) framework. These methods have been evaluated on two distinct datasets of different tumor types collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and the experimental results indicate that our methods are (i) extensible to different tumor types; (ii) robust in the presence of wide technical and biological variations; (iii) invariant to different nuclear segmentation strategies; and (iv) scalable with varying training sample size. In addition, our experiments suggest that enforcing sparsity, during the construction of morphometric context, further improves the performance of the system. Hang Chang, Alexander Borowsky, Paul T. Spellman, Bahram Parvin |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2013 | Invariant Delineation of Nuclear Architecture in Glioblastoma Multiforme for Clinical and Molecular AssociationabstractAutomated analysis of whole mount tissue sections can provide insights into tumor subtypes and the underlying molecular basis of neoplasm. However, since tumor sections are collected from different laboratories, inherent technical and biological variations impede analysis for very large datasets such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Our objective is to characterize tumor histopathology, through the delineation of the nuclear regions, from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections. Such a representation can then be mined for intrinsic subtypes across a large dataset for prediction and molecular association. Furthermore, nuclear segmentation is formulated within a multi-reference graph framework with geodesic constraints, which enables computation of multidimensional representations, on a cell-by-cell basis, for functional enrichment and bioinformatics analysis. Here, we present a novel method, multi-reference graph cut (MRGC), for nuclear segmentation that overcomes technical variations associated with sample preparation by incorporating prior knowledge from manually annotated reference images and local image features. The proposed approach has been validated on manually annotated samples and then applied to a dataset of 377 Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) whole slide images from 146 patients. For the GBM cohort, multidimensional representation of the nuclear features and their organization have identified 1) statistically significant subtypes based on several morphometric indexes, 2) whether each subtype can be predictive or not, and 3) that the molecular correlates of predictive subtypes are consistent with the literature. Data and intermediaries for a number of tumor types (GBM, low grade glial, and kidney renal clear carcinoma) are available at: http://tcga.lbl.gov for correlation with TCGA molecular data. The website also provides an interface for panning and zooming of whole mount tissue sections with/without overlaid segmentation results for quality control. Hang Chang, Ju Han, Alexander Borowsky, Leandro A. Loss, Joe W. Gray, Paul T. Spellman, Bahram Parvin |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 3 |