Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kirstie J. Whitaker

dblp:117/0896 · also Kirstie Jane Whitaker · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8498-4059ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 77% Computational social science and digital humanities · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education › STEM education
data science education
0.712023
How to Data in Datathons · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

framework · 0.7case study · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a responsible data science workflow
abstract
Contributors and beneficiaries of data-intensive research have become increasingly concerned about social and ethical risks from data science and machine learning applications
Sara Stoudt, Yacine Jernite, Brandeis Marshall, Ben Marwick, Malvika Sharan, Kirstie J. Whitaker, Valentin Danchev
PLoS Comput. Biol.6
2023 How to Data in Datathons
abstract
The rise of datathons, also known as data or data science hackathons, has provided a platform to collaborate, learn, and innovate quickly. Despite their significant potential benefits, organizations often struggle to effectively work with data due to a lack of clear guidelines and best practices for potential issues that might arise. Drawing on our own experiences and insights from organizing +80 datathon challenges with +60 partnership organizations since 2016, we provide a guide that serves as a resource for organizers to navigate the data-related complexities of datathons. We apply our proposed framework to 10 case studies.
Carlos Mougan, Richard Plant, Clare Teng, Marya Bazzi, Alvaro Cabrejas Egea, Ryan Sze-Yin Chan, David Salvador Jasin, Martin Stoffel, Kirstie J. Whitaker, Jules Manser
NeurIPS9