Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Plohmann

dblp:117/1992 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-9788-4376ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Malware analysis · 63% Network security · 37%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Malware analysis › botnet
domain generation algorithm
0.212016
A Comprehensive Measurement Study of Domain Generating Malware · USENIX Security Symposium 2016
Malware analysis
botnet
0.212013
SoK: P2PWNED - Modeling and Evaluating the Resilience of Peer-to-Peer Botnets · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2013
Network security › attack resilience › attack mitigation › botnet defense
botnet takedown
0.212013
SoK: P2PWNED - Modeling and Evaluating the Resilience of Peer-to-Peer Botnets · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2013
Network security › protocol security › DNS security
malicious domain detection
0.112016
A Comprehensive Measurement Study of Domain Generating Malware · USENIX Security Symposium 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

measurement study · 0.2percolation theory · 0.2graph modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Down to earth! Guidelines for DGA-based Malware Detection
abstract
Successful malware campaigns rely on Command-and-Control (C2) infrastructure, enabling attackers to extract sensitive data and give instructions to bots. As a resilient mechanism to obtain C2 endpoints, attackers can employ Domain Generation Algorithms (DGAs), which automatically generate C2 domains instead of relying on static ones. Thus, researchers have proposed network-level detection approaches that reveal DGA usage by differentiating between non-DGA and generated domains. Recent approaches train machine learning (ML) models to recognize DGA domains using pattern recognition at the domain’s character level.
Bogdan Cebere, Jonathan Lasse Bennet Flueren, Silvia Sebastián, Daniel Plohmann, Christian Rossow
RAID4
2016 A Comprehensive Measurement Study of Domain Generating Malware
Daniel Plohmann, Khaled Yakdan, Michael Klatt, Elmar Gerhards-Padilla
USENIX Security Symposium1
2013 SoK: P2PWNED - Modeling and Evaluating the Resilience of Peer-to-Peer Botnets
abstract
Centralized botnets are easy targets for takedown efforts by computer security researchers and law enforcement. Thus, botnet controllers have sought new ways to harden the infrastructures of their botnets. In order to meet this objective, some botnet operators have (re)designed their botnets to use Peer-to-Peer (P2P) infrastructures. Many P2P botnets are far more resilient to takedown attempts than centralized botnets, because they have no single points of failure. However, P2P botnets are subject to unique classes of attacks, such as node enumeration and poisoning. In this paper, we introduce a formal graph model to capture the intrinsic properties and fundamental vulnerabilities of P2P botnets. We apply our model to current P2P botnets to assess their resilience against attacks. We provide assessments on the sizes of all eleven active P2P botnets, showing that some P2P botnet families contain over a million bots. In addition, we have prototyped several mitigation strategies to measure the resilience of existing P2P botnets. We believe that the results from our analysis can be used to assist security researchers in evaluating mitigation strategies against current and future P2P botnets.
Christian Rossow, Dennis Andriesse, Tillmann Werner, Brett Stone-Gross, Daniel Plohmann, Christian Dietrich 0005, Herbert Bos
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy5