Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bernard Michini

dblp:117/2229 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 94% Robot manipulation · 6%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning
0.532015
Bayesian Nonparametric Reward Learning From Demonstration · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Scalable reward learning from demonstration · ICRA 2013
Improving the efficiency of Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning · ICRA 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward learning from demonstrations
0.422015
Bayesian Nonparametric Reward Learning From Demonstration · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Scalable reward learning from demonstration · ICRA 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
bayesian reward learning
0.112012
Improving the efficiency of Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.112015
Bayesian Nonparametric Reward Learning From Demonstration · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov decision process · 0.3inverse reinforcement learning · 0.2gaussian process · 0.2bayesian nonparametric model · 0.2bayesian nonparametric methods · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Bayesian Nonparametric Reward Learning From Demonstration
abstract
Learning from demonstration provides an attractive solution to the problem of teaching autonomous systems how to perform complex tasks. Reward learning from demonstration is a promising method of inferring a rich and transferable representation of the demonstrator's intents, but current algorithms suffer from intractability and inefficiency in large domains due to the assumption that the demonstrator is maximizing a single reward function throughout the whole task. This paper takes a different perspective by assuming that the reward function behind an unsegmented demonstration is actually composed of several distinct subtasks chained together. Leveraging this assumption, a Bayesian nonparametric reward-learning framework is presented that infers multiple subgoals and reward functions within a single unsegmented demonstration. The new framework is developed for discrete state spaces and also general continuous demonstration domains using Gaussian process reward representations. The algorithm is shown to have both performance and computational advantages over existing inverse reinforcement learning methods. Experimental results are given in both cases, demonstrating the ability to learn challenging maneuvers from demonstration on a quadrotor and a remote-controlled car.
Bernard Michini, Thomas J. Walsh 0001, Ali-akbar Agha-mohammadi, Jonathan P. How
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2013 Scalable reward learning from demonstration
abstract
Reward learning from demonstration is the task of inferring the intents or goals of an agent demonstrating a task. Inverse reinforcement learning methods utilize the Markov decision process (MDP) framework to learn rewards, but typically scale poorly since they rely on the calculation of optimal value functions. Several key modifications are made to a previously developed Bayesian nonparametric inverse reinforcement learning algorithm that avoid calculation of an optimal value function and no longer require discretization of the state or action spaces. Experimental results given demonstrate the ability of the resulting algorithm to scale to larger problems and learn in domains with continuous demonstrations.
Bernard Michini, Mark Cutler, Jonathan P. How
ICRA1
2012 Improving the efficiency of Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning
abstract
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the task of learning the reward function of a Markov Decision Process (MDP) given knowledge of the transition function and a set of expert demonstrations. While many IRL algorithms exist, Bayesian IRL [1] provides a general and principled method of reward learning by casting the problem in the Bayesian inference framework. However, the algorithm as originally presented suffers from several inefficiencies that prohibit its use for even moderate problem sizes. This paper proposes modifications to the original Bayesian IRL algorithm to improve its efficiency and tractability in situations where the state space is large and the expert demonstrations span only a small portion of it. The key insight is that the inference task should be focused on states that are similar to those encountered by the expert, as opposed to making the naive assumption that the expert demonstrations contain enough information to accurately infer the reward function over the entire state space. A modified algorithm is presented and experimental results show substantially faster convergence while maintaining the solution quality of the original method.
Bernard Michini, Jonathan P. How
ICRA1
2012 Bayesian Nonparametric Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Bernard Michini, Jonathan P. How
ECML/PKDD (2)1