Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Enpeng Yao

dblp:117/4319 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 38% Data mining · 32% Information retrieval · 25%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
text analysis
0.212014
Probabilistic text modeling with orthogonalized topics · SIGIR 2014
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling
0.212014
Probabilistic text modeling with orthogonalized topics · SIGIR 2014
Recommender systems › personalized ranking
collaborative ranking
0.112012
Collaborative personalized tweet recommendation · SIGIR 2012
Recommender systems › social recommendation
tweet recommendation
0.112012
Collaborative personalized tweet recommendation · SIGIR 2012
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.112014
Probabilistic text modeling with orthogonalized topics · SIGIR 2014
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.012012
Collaborative personalized tweet recommendation · SIGIR 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

newton-raphson · 0.2expectation-maximization · 0.2collaborative ranking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Probabilistic text modeling with orthogonalized topics
abstract
Topic models have been widely used for text analysis. Previous topic models have enjoyed great success in mining the latent topic structure of text documents. With many efforts made on endowing the resulting document-topic distributions with different motivations, however, none of these models have paid any attention on the resulting topic-word distributions.Since topic-word distribution also plays an important role in the modeling performance,topic models which emphasize only the resulting document-topic representations but pay less attention to the topic-term distributions are limited. In this paper, we propose the Orthogonalized Topic Model(OTM) which imposes an orthogonality constraint on the topic-term distributions. We also propose a novel model fitting algorithm based on the generalized Expectation-Maximization algorithm and the Newthon-Raphson method. Quantitative evaluation of text classification demonstrates that OTM outperforms other baseline models and indicates the important role played by topic orthogonalizing.
Enpeng Yao, Guoqing Zheng, Ou Jin, Shenghua Bao, Kailong Chen, Zhong Su, Yong Yu 0001
SIGIR1
2012 Collaborative personalized tweet recommendation
abstract
Twitter has rapidly grown to a popular social network in recent years and provides a large number of real-time messages for users. Tweets are presented in chronological order and users scan the followees' timelines to find what they are interested in. However, an information overload problem has troubled many users, especially those with many followees and thousands of tweets arriving every day. In this paper, we focus on recommending useful tweets that users are really interested in personally to reduce the users' effort to find useful information. Many kinds of information on Twitter are available for helping recommendation, including the user's own tweet history, retweet history and social relations between users. We propose a method of making tweet recommendations based on collaborative ranking to capture personal interests. It can also conveniently integrate the other useful contextual information. Our final method considers three major elements on Twitter: tweet topic level factors, user social relation factors and explicit features such as authority of the publisher and quality of the tweet. The experiments show that all the proposed elements are important and our method greatly outperforms several baseline methods.
Kailong Chen, Tianqi Chen 0001, Guoqing Zheng, Ou Jin, Enpeng Yao, Yong Yu 0001
SIGIR5