Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaul Oron
dblp:117/4769
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1649-5947ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 82% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 18% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 56% Image recognition and object detection · 34% 3D vision · 10% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Locally Orderless Tracking · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015 Locally Orderless Tracking · CVPR 2012 |
Image and video processing › image matching
template matching |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Best-Buddies Similarity - Robust Template Matching Using Mutual Nearest Neighbors · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
template matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Best-Buddies Similarity for robust template matching · CVPR 2015 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
object tracking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Extended Lucas-Kanade Tracking · ECCV (5) 2014 |
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Extended Lucas-Kanade Tracking · ECCV (5) 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
feature matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Best-Buddies Similarity for robust template matching · CVPR 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical analysis · 0.5mutual nearest neighbors · 0.3locally orderless matching · 0.2lucas-kanade · 0.2probabilistic model · 0.1earth mover's distance · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Gaze Pre-Train For Improving Disparity Estimation NetworksabstractIn the process of training Neural Networks, pre-training is an unsupervised training process that uses automatically generated labels for real end-goal task inputs. It usually precedes a supervised training stage, can improve neural network performance, and can reduce training loss. In this work, we used pre-training in the automotive domain where the setup was composed of a camera aimed outside the vehicle and an eye tracking system observing the driver. Our pre-training process used images from the camera as input and eye gaze direction as the automatic generated label. The eye gaze pre-training goal was to initiate and thus improve disparity estimation networks.Selecting eye gaze as labels is the best of both worlds. On one hand, it is somewhat similar to supervised training. Labels are generated by humans, by drivers who have deep understanding of the scenes and driving situation. On the other hand, it is similar to unsupervised training. The labels can be generated automatically. Large quantities of data can be collected easily. Overall, the eye gaze pre-train helped reduce the L1 loss from 0.65 when not using pre-train to 0.45 when using it on the validation set. Ron M. Hecht, Ohad Rahamim, Shaul Oron, Andrea Forgacs, Gershon Celniker, Dan Levi, Omer Tsimhoni |
ICASSP | 3 |
| 2018 | Best-Buddies Similarity - Robust Template Matching Using Mutual Nearest NeighborsabstractWe propose a novel method for template matching in unconstrained environments. Its essence is the Best-Buddies Similarity (BBS), a useful, robust, and parameter-free similarity measure between two sets of points. BBS is based on counting the number of Best-Buddies Pairs (BBPs)-pairs of points in source and target sets that are mutual nearest neighbours, i.e., each point is the nearest neighbour of the other. BBS has several key features that make it robust against complex geometric deformations and high levels of outliers, such as those arising from background clutter and occlusions. We study these properties, provide a statistical analysis that justifies them, and demonstrate the consistent success of BBS on a challenging real-world dataset while using different types of features. Shaul Oron, Tali Dekel, Tianfan Xue, William T. Freeman, Shai Avidan |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2015 | Best-Buddies Similarity for robust template matchingabstractWe propose a novel method for template matching in unconstrained environments. Its essence is the Best-Buddies Similarity (BBS), a useful, robust, and parameter-free similarity measure between two sets of points. BBS is based on counting the number of Best-Buddies Pairs (BBPs)-pairs of points in source and target sets, where each point is the nearest neighbor of the other. BBS has several key features that make it robust against complex geometric deformations and high levels of outliers, such as those arising from background clutter and occlusions. We study these properties, provide a statistical analysis that justifies them, and demonstrate the consistent success of BBS on a challenging real-world dataset. Tali Dekel, Shaul Oron, Michael Rubinstein, Shai Avidan, William T. Freeman |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2015 | Locally Orderless Tracking
Shaul Oron, Aharon Bar-Hillel, Dan Levi, Shai Avidan |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2015 | Real-time tracking-with-detection for coping with viewpoint change
Shaul Oron, Aharon Bar-Hillel, Shai Avidan |
Mach. Vis. Appl. | 1 |
| 2014 | Extended Lucas-Kanade Tracking
Shaul Oron, Aharon Bar-Hillel, Shai Avidan |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2012 | Locally Orderless TrackingabstractLocally Orderless Tracking (LOT) is a visual tracking algorithm that automatically estimates the amount of local (dis)order in the object. This lets the tracker specialize in both rigid and deformable objects on-line and with no prior assumptions. We provide a probabilistic model of the object variations over time. The model is implemented using the Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) with two parameters that control the cost of moving pixels and changing their color. We adjust these costs on-line during tracking to account for the amount of local (dis)order in the object. We show LOT's tracking capabilities on challenging video sequences, both commonly used and new, demonstrating performance comparable to state-of-the-art methods. Shaul Oron, Aharon Bar-Hillel, Dan Levi, Shai Avidan |
CVPR | 1 |