Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiangxin Zhu

dblp:117/4843 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Face, body and person analysis · 42% Image recognition and object detection · 26% Learning theory · 24%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.212016
Do We Need More Training Data? · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2016
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.212014
Capturing Long-Tail Distributions of Object Subcategories · CVPR 2014
Data mining
clustering
0.212014
Capturing Long-Tail Distributions of Object Subcategories · CVPR 2014
Data mining › clustering
discriminative clustering
0.212014
Capturing Long-Tail Distributions of Object Subcategories · CVPR 2014
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face alignment
0.112012
Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face detection
0.112012
Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
head pose estimation
0.112012
Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape representation
deformable model
0.012012
Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
tree-based models
0.012012
Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mixture model · 0.4distributed learning · 0.4shared part pool · 0.1mixtures of trees · 0.1global mixtures · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Multiple Instance Curriculum Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detection
Siyang Li 0002, Xiangxin Zhu, Qin Huang 0006, C.-C. Jay Kuo
BMVC2
2016 Do We Need More Training Data?
Xiangxin Zhu, Carl Vondrick, Charless C. Fowlkes, Deva Ramanan
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
2014 Capturing Long-Tail Distributions of Object Subcategories
abstract
We argue that object subcategories follow a long-tail distribution: a few subcategories are common, while many are rare. We describe distributed algorithms for learning large- mixture models that capture long-tail distributions, which are hard to model with current approaches. We introduce a generalized notion of mixtures (or subcategories) that allow for examples to be shared across multiple subcategories. We optimize our models with a discriminative clustering algorithm that searches over mixtures in a distributed, "brute-force" fashion. We used our scalable system to train tens of thousands of deformable mixtures for VOC objects. We demonstrate significant performance improvements, particularly for object classes that are characterized by large appearance variation.
Xiangxin Zhu, Dragomir Anguelov, Deva Ramanan
CVPR1
2012 Do We Need More Training Data or Better Models for Object Detection?
abstract
(Work performed while at UC Irvine) Datasets for training object recognition systems are steadily growing in size. This paper investigates the question of whether existing detectors will continue to improve as data grows, or if models are close to saturating due to limited model complexity and the Bayes risk associated with the feature spaces in which they operate. We focus on the popular paradigm of scanning-window templates defined on oriented gradient fea-tures, trained with discriminative classifiers. We investigate the performance of mixtures of templates as a function of the number of templates (complexity) and the amount of training data. We find that additional data does help, but only with correct regularization and treatment of noisy examples or “outliers ” in the training data. Surprisingly, the per-formance of problem domain-agnostic mixture models appears to saturate quickly (∼10 templates and ∼100 positive training examples per template). However, compositional mixtures (implemented via composed parts) give much better performance because they share parameters among templates, and can synthesize new templates not encountered during training. This suggests there is still room to improve performance with linear classifiers and the existing feature space by improved representations and learning algo-rithms. 1
Xiangxin Zhu, Carl Vondrick, Deva Ramanan, Charless C. Fowlkes
BMVC1
2012 Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild
abstract
We present a unified model for face detection, pose estimation, and landmark estimation in real-world, cluttered images. Our model is based on a mixtures of trees with a shared pool of parts; we model every facial landmark as a part and use global mixtures to capture topological changes due to viewpoint. We show that tree-structured models are surprisingly effective at capturing global elastic deformation, while being easy to optimize unlike dense graph structures. We present extensive results on standard face benchmarks, as well as a new “in the wild” annotated dataset, that suggests our system advances the state-of-the-art, sometimes considerably, for all three tasks. Though our model is modestly trained with hundreds of faces, it compares favorably to commercial systems trained with billions of examples (such as Google Picasa and face.com).
Xiangxin Zhu, Deva Ramanan
CVPR1