Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiangxin Zhu
dblp:117/4843
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Face, body and person analysis · 42% Image recognition and object detection · 26% Learning theory · 24% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Do We Need More Training Data? · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2016 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Capturing Long-Tail Distributions of Object Subcategories · CVPR 2014 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Capturing Long-Tail Distributions of Object Subcategories · CVPR 2014 |
Data mining › clustering
discriminative clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Capturing Long-Tail Distributions of Object Subcategories · CVPR 2014 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face alignment |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
head pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape representation
deformable model |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
tree-based models |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild · CVPR 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixture model · 0.4distributed learning · 0.4shared part pool · 0.1mixtures of trees · 0.1global mixtures · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Multiple Instance Curriculum Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detection
Siyang Li 0002, Xiangxin Zhu, Qin Huang 0006, C.-C. Jay Kuo |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2016 | Do We Need More Training Data?
Xiangxin Zhu, Carl Vondrick, Charless C. Fowlkes, Deva Ramanan |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2014 | Capturing Long-Tail Distributions of Object SubcategoriesabstractWe argue that object subcategories follow a long-tail distribution: a few subcategories are common, while many are rare. We describe distributed algorithms for learning large- mixture models that capture long-tail distributions, which are hard to model with current approaches. We introduce a generalized notion of mixtures (or subcategories) that allow for examples to be shared across multiple subcategories. We optimize our models with a discriminative clustering algorithm that searches over mixtures in a distributed, "brute-force" fashion. We used our scalable system to train tens of thousands of deformable mixtures for VOC objects. We demonstrate significant performance improvements, particularly for object classes that are characterized by large appearance variation. Xiangxin Zhu, Dragomir Anguelov, Deva Ramanan |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2012 | Do We Need More Training Data or Better Models for Object Detection?abstract(Work performed while at UC Irvine) Datasets for training object recognition systems are steadily growing in size. This paper investigates the question of whether existing detectors will continue to improve as data grows, or if models are close to saturating due to limited model complexity and the Bayes risk associated with the feature spaces in which they operate. We focus on the popular paradigm of scanning-window templates defined on oriented gradient fea-tures, trained with discriminative classifiers. We investigate the performance of mixtures of templates as a function of the number of templates (complexity) and the amount of training data. We find that additional data does help, but only with correct regularization and treatment of noisy examples or “outliers ” in the training data. Surprisingly, the per-formance of problem domain-agnostic mixture models appears to saturate quickly (∼10 templates and ∼100 positive training examples per template). However, compositional mixtures (implemented via composed parts) give much better performance because they share parameters among templates, and can synthesize new templates not encountered during training. This suggests there is still room to improve performance with linear classifiers and the existing feature space by improved representations and learning algo-rithms. 1 Xiangxin Zhu, Carl Vondrick, Deva Ramanan, Charless C. Fowlkes |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2012 | Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wildabstractWe present a unified model for face detection, pose estimation, and landmark estimation in real-world, cluttered images. Our model is based on a mixtures of trees with a shared pool of parts; we model every facial landmark as a part and use global mixtures to capture topological changes due to viewpoint. We show that tree-structured models are surprisingly effective at capturing global elastic deformation, while being easy to optimize unlike dense graph structures. We present extensive results on standard face benchmarks, as well as a new “in the wild” annotated dataset, that suggests our system advances the state-of-the-art, sometimes considerably, for all three tasks. Though our model is modestly trained with hundreds of faces, it compares favorably to commercial systems trained with billions of examples (such as Google Picasa and face.com). Xiangxin Zhu, Deva Ramanan |
CVPR | 1 |