Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samuel Nicol
dblp:117/4910
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 71% Reinforcement learning · 29% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 54% Computational complexity · 46% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.6 | 2 | 2021 | A Universal 2-state n-action Adaptive Management Solver · AAAI 2021 MOMDPs: A Solution for Modelling Adaptive Management Problems · AAAI 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty › partially observable markov decision process
mixed observability markov decision process |
0.6 | 2 | 2021 | A Universal 2-state n-action Adaptive Management Solver · AAAI 2021 MOMDPs: A Solution for Modelling Adaptive Management Problems · AAAI 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process |
0.6 | 2 | 2021 | A Universal 2-state n-action Adaptive Management Solver · AAAI 2021 MOMDPs: A Solution for Modelling Adaptive Management Problems · AAAI 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
decision making under uncertainty |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | A Universal 2-state n-action Adaptive Management Solver · AAAI 2021 |
Computational complexity › complexity classes › PSPACE
PSPACE-completeness |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | MOMDPs: A Solution for Modelling Adaptive Management Problems · AAAI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
expert elicitation · 0.5analytical model set construction · 0.5value iteration · 0.3belief update · 0.3backup operator · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | A Universal 2-state n-action Adaptive Management SolverabstractIn poor data and urgent decision-making applications, managers need to make decisions without complete knowledge of the system dynamics. In biodiversity conservation, adaptive management (AM) is the principal tool for decision-making under uncertainty. AM can be solved using simplified Mixed Observable Markov Decision Processes called hidden model MDPs (hmMDPs) when the unknown dynamics are assumed stationary. hmMDPs provide optimal policies to AM problems by augmenting the MDP state space with an unobservable state variable representing a finite set of predefined models. A drawback in formalising an AM problem is that experts are often solicited to provide this predefined set of models by specifying the transition matrices. Expert elicitation is a challenging and time-consuming process that is prone to biases, and a key assumption of hmMDPs is that the true transition matrix will be included in the candidate model set. We propose an original approach to build a hmMDP with a universal set of predefined models that is capable of solving any 2-state n-action AM problem. Our approach uses properties of the transition matrices to build the model set and is independent of expert input, removing the potential for expert error in the optimal solution. We provide analytical formulations to derive the minimum set of models to include into an hmMDP to solve any AM problems with 2 states and n actions. We assess our universal AM algorithm on two species conservation case studies from Australia and randomly generated problems. Luz Valerie Pascal, Marianne Akian, Samuel Nicol, Iadine Chades |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2013 | Adaptive Management of Migratory Birds Under Sea Level Rise
Samuel Nicol, Olivier Buffet, Takuya Iwamura, Iadine Chades |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2012 | MOMDPs: A Solution for Modelling Adaptive Management ProblemsabstractIn conservation biology and natural resource management, adaptive management is an iterative process of improving management by reducing uncertainty via monitoring. Adaptive management is the principal tool for conserving endangered species under global change, yet adaptive management problems suffer from a poor suite of solution methods. The common approach used to solve an adaptive management problem is to assume the system state is known and the system dynamics can be one of a set of pre-defined models. The solution method used is unsatisfactory, employing value iteration on a discretized belief MDP which restricts the study to very small problems. We show how to overcome this limitation by modelling an adaptive management problem as a restricted Mixed Observability MDP called hidden model MDP (hmMDP). We demonstrate how to simplify the value function, the backup operator and the belief update computation. We show that, although a simplified case of POMDPs, hm-MDPs are PSPACE-complete in the finite-horizon case. We illustrate the use of this model to manage a population of the threatened Gouldian finch, a bird species endemic to Northern Australia. Our simple modelling approach is an important step towards efficient algorithms for solving adaptive management problems. Iadine Chades, Josie Carwardine, Tara G. Martin, Samuel Nicol, Régis Sabbadin, Olivier Buffet |
AAAI | 4 |