Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Van Esbroeck

dblp:117/4944 · also Alex P. Van Esbroeck · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-4190-9985ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% Information extraction and text analysis · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212016
Monotonic Calibrated Interpolated Look-Up Tables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
monotonicity
0.212016
Monotonic Calibrated Interpolated Look-Up Tables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
missing data
0.212014
Evaluating Trauma Patients: Addressing Missing Covariates with Joint Optimization · AAAI 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.112012
Heart Rate Topic Models · AAAI 2012
Medical and health informatics › clinical prediction
clinical outcome prediction
0.112014
Evaluating Trauma Patients: Addressing Missing Covariates with Joint Optimization · AAAI 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent structure discovery
0.012012
Heart Rate Topic Models · AAAI 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural risk minimization · 0.5probabilistic modeling · 0.4joint optimization · 0.4topic modeling · 0.3latent dirichlet allocation · 0.3linear inequality constraints · 0.2linear inequality constraint · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Monotonic Calibrated Interpolated Look-Up Tables
abstract
Real-world machine learning applications may have requirements beyond accuracy, such as fast evaluation times and interpretability. In particular, guaranteed monotonicity of the learned function with respect to some of the inputs can be critical for user confidence. We propose meeting these goals for low-dimensional machine learning problems by learning flexible, monotonic functions using calibrated interpolated look-up tables. We extend the structural risk minimization framework of lattice regression to monotonic functions by adding linear inequality constraints. In addition, we propose jointly learning interpretable calibrations of each feature to normalize continuous features and handle categorical or missing data, at the cost of making the objective non-convex. We address large- scale learning through parallelization, mini-batching, and random sampling of additive regularizer terms. Case studies on real-world problems with up to sixteen features and up to hundreds of millions of training samples demonstrate the proposed monotonic functions can achieve state-of-the-art accuracy in practice while providing greater transparency to users.
Maya R. Gupta, Andrew Cotter, Jan Pfeifer, Konstantin Voevodski, Kevin Robert Canini, Alexander Mangylov, Wojtek Moczydlowski, Alexander Van Esbroeck
J. Mach. Learn. Res.8
2016 Multi-task seizure detection: addressing intra-patient variation in seizure morphologies
Alexander Van Esbroeck, Landon Smith, Zeeshan Syed, Satinder Singh 0001, Zahi N. Karam
Mach. Learn.1
2015 Predicting readmission risk with institution-specific prediction models
Shipeng Yu, Faisal Farooq, Alexander Van Esbroeck, Glenn Fung, Vikram Anand, Balaji Krishnapuram
Artif. Intell. Medicine3
2014 Evaluating Trauma Patients: Addressing Missing Covariates with Joint Optimization
abstract
Missing values are a common problem when applying classification algorithms to real-world medical data. This is especially true for trauma patients, where the emergent nature of the cases makes it difficult to collect all of the relevant data for each patient. Standard methods for handling missingness first learn a model to estimate missing data values, and subsequently train and evaluate a classifier using data imputed with this model. Recently, several proposed methods have demonstrated the benefits of jointly estimating the imputation model and classifier parameters. However, these methods make assumptions that limit their utility with many real-world medical datasets. For example, the assumption that data elements are missing at random is often invalid. We address this situation by exploring a novel approach for jointly learning the imputation model and classifier. Unlike previous algorithms, our approach makes no assumptions about the missingness of the data, can be used with arbitrary probabilistic data models and classification loss functions, and can be used when both the training and testing data have missing values. We investigate the utility of this approach on the prediction of several patient outcomes in a large national registry of trauma patients, and find that it significantly outperforms standard sequential methods.
Alexander Van Esbroeck, Satinder Singh 0001, Ilan Rubinfeld, Zeeshan Syed
AAAI1
2012 Heart Rate Topic Models
abstract
A key challenge in reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease is matching patients to treatments that are most appropriate for them. Different cardiac assessment tools have been developed to address this goal. Recent research has focused on heart rate motifs, i.e., short-term heart rate sequences that are over- or under-represented in long-term electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings of patients experiencing cardiovascular outcomes, which provide novel and valuable information for risk stratification. However, this approach can leverage only a small number of motifs for prediction and results in difficult to interpret models. We address these limitations by identifying latent structure in the large numbers of motifs found in long-term ECG recordings. In particular, we explore the application of topic models to heart rate time series to identify functional sets of heart rate sequences and to concisely describe patients using task-independent features for various cardiovascular outcomes. We evaluate the approach on a large collection of real-world ECG data, and investigate the performance of topic mixture features for the prediction of cardiovascular mortality. The topics provided an interpretable representation of the recordings and maintained valuable information for clinical assessment when compared with motif frequencies, even after accounting for commonly used clinical risk scores.
Alexander Van Esbroeck, Chih-Chun Chia, Zeeshan Syed
AAAI1
2012 Quantifying Surgical Complexity through Textual Descriptions of Current Procedural Terminology Codes
Alexander Van Esbroeck, Ilan Rubinfeld, Zeeshan Syed
AMIA1
2012 Building Hospital-Specific Readmission Risk Prediction Models for Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial Infarction and Pneumonia patients
Shipeng Yu, Faisal Farooq, Glenn Fung, Balaji Krishnapuram, Alexander Van Esbroeck, Vikram Anand
AMIA5