Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Riyadh Mahmood
dblp:117/5451
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 91% Program analysis · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
automated testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | EvoDroid: segmented evolutionary testing of Android apps · SIGSOFT FSE 2014 |
Software testing › test generation › search-based test generation
evolutionary testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | EvoDroid: segmented evolutionary testing of Android apps · SIGSOFT FSE 2014 |
Software testing
test generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | EvoDroid: segmented evolutionary testing of Android apps · SIGSOFT FSE 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
program analysis · 0.2evolutionary algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Framework for Automated API Fuzzing at Enterprise ScaleabstractWeb-based Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are often described using SOAP, OpenAPI, and GraphQL specifications. These specifications provide a consistent way to define web services and enable automated fuzz testing. As such, many fuzzers take advantage of these specifications. However, in an enterprise setting, the tools are usually installed and scaled by individual teams, leading to duplication of efforts. There is a need for an enterprise-wide fuzz testing solution to provide shared, cost efficient, off-nominal testing at scale where fuzzers can be plugged-in as needed. Internet cloud-based fuzz testing-as-a-service solutions mitigate scalability concerns but are not always feasible as they require artifacts to be uploaded to external infrastructure. Typically, corporate policies prevent sharing artifacts with third parties due to cost, intellectual property, and security concerns. We utilize API specifications and combine them with cluster computing elasticity to build an automated, scalable framework that can fuzz multiple apps at once and retain the trust boundary of the enterprise. Riyadh Mahmood, Jay Pennington, Danny Tsang, Tan Tran, Andrea Bogle |
ICST | 1 |
| 2015 | SIG-Droid: Automated system input generation for Android applicationsabstractPervasiveness of smartphones and the vast number of corresponding apps have underlined the need for applicable automated software testing techniques. A wealth of research has been focused on either unit or GUI testing of smartphone apps, but little on automated support for end-to-end system testing. This paper presents SIG-Droid, a framework for system testing of Android apps, backed with automated program analysis to extract app models and symbolic execution of source code guided by such models for obtaining test inputs that ensure covering each reachable branch in the program. SIG-Droid leverages two automatically extracted models: Interface Model and Behavior Model. The Interface Model is used to find values that an app can receive through its interfaces. Those values are then exchanged with symbolic values to deal with constraints with the help of a symbolic execution engine. The Behavior Model is used to drive the apps for symbolic execution and generate sequences of events. We provide an efficient implementation of SIG-Droid based in part on Symbolic PathFinder, extended in this work to support automatic testing of Android apps. Our experiments show SIG-Droid is able to achieve significantly higher code coverage than existing automated testing tools targeted for Android. Nariman Mirzaei, Hamid Bagheri, Riyadh Mahmood, Sam Malek |
ISSRE | 3 |
| 2014 | EvoDroid: segmented evolutionary testing of Android appsabstractProliferation of Android devices and apps has created a demand for applicable automated software testing techniques. Prior research has primarily focused on either unit or GUI testing of Android apps, but not their end-to-end system testing in a systematic manner. We present EvoDroid, an evolutionary approach for system testing of Android apps. EvoDroid overcomes a key shortcoming of using evolutionary techniques for system testing, i.e., the inability to pass on genetic makeup of good individuals in the search. To that end, EvoDroid combines two novel techniques: (1) an Android-specific program analysis technique that identifies the segments of the code amenable to be searched independently, and (2) an evolutionary algorithm that given information of such segments performs a step-wise search for test cases reaching deep into the code. Our experiments have corroborated EvoDroid’s ability to achieve significantly higher code coverage than existing Android testing tools. Riyadh Mahmood, Nariman Mirzaei, Sam Malek |
SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |