Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Rathgeb

dblp:117/6758 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
office information systems
0.011986
Methodological Issues for the Design of an Office Information Server - Focal Topics for the Analysis from an Office System Perspective · SIGIR 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

requirements analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Methodological Issues for the Design of an Office Information Server - Focal Topics for the Analysis from an Office System Perspective
abstract
This paper deal with the necessity of consideration of organizational and user requirements to create the basis for the successful design of future office information servers.Today volumes of the order of 10.000 to 50.000 multimode documents and 1 to 10 million documents at a company level (companies with over 1000 employees) per system have to be archived. The average amount of filing is 12 to 16 running metres of paper per year, with an increasing tendency (Ben84).However the shortcoming of systems of today is not the incapability of storage of big amounts of information but the fact they only support particular (and well structured) office tasks in an operative way. Future systems have to support all kind of work (procedures) people do in an office, consider the strategic and operative goals of the particular office and take the user behaviours especially their knowledge to solve problems and the individual kind of doing their jobs (e.g. search strategies, reminder functions) into account.Analysis methods for the collection of data for the design of office systems have mostly been developed in the context of office automation to develop systems to support particular tasks, to restructure offices to improve the profitability of the company. Because of that fact, these methods must be quite extended to supply data which are suited for the successful design and development of future office information servers.Focal topics of the analysis from an office system perspective are: information generation and location, consistency and permanence, work support, information handling and manipulation, access right and confidentiality, accountability, information flow and use of abstractions. Detailed dimensions concerning these areas are posted in this paper.
Till W. Truckenmüller, Michael Rathgeb
SIGIR2