EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cathleen Stasz
dblp:117/7486
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Computer-supported cooperative work: examples and issues in one federal agency · CSCW 1986 |
Empirical software engineering › practitioner studies
workplace studies |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Computer-supported cooperative work: examples and issues in one federal agency · CSCW 1986 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
case study · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | Computer-supported cooperative work: examples and issues in one federal agencyabstractArticle Free Access Share on Computer-supported cooperative work: examples and issues in one federal agency Authors: Cathleen Stasz The Rand Corporation The Rand CorporationView Profile , Tora K. Bikson The Rand Corporation The Rand CorporationView Profile Authors Info & Claims CSCW '86: Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative workDecember 1986 Pages 318–324https://doi.org/10.1145/637069.637111Online:03 December 1986Publication History 5citation314DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations5Total Downloads314Last 12 Months12Last 6 weeks1 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF Cathleen Stasz, Tora K. Bikson |
CSCW | 1 |
| 1981 | Network Structures for Distributed Situation AssessmentabstractA new approach to situation assessment is an automated distributed sensor network (DSN) consisting of many "intelligent" sensor devices that can pool their knowledge to achieve an accurate overall assessment of a situation. Laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate potential DSN organizations and to ascertain some general design principles. These experiments have been performed with a network of "sensor nodes," each of whom sees only a small portion of the entire environment and attempts to identify the environmental mobile entities as quickly as possible. To do this, they must cooperatively communicate their hypotheses and data, using a limited number of messages. Two general DSN organizations were tested. The first was hierarchical. The second was an "anarchic committee" whose nodes could each send messages to one, some, or all other nodes. The performance of the committee organization consistently surpassed the hierarchical one. This lent support to the contention that DSN architectures need to emphasize cooperative aspects of problem-solving. A machine-based simulation of such a network that achieved performance levels comparable to that of the human committee DSN organization was also constructed and tested. Because most situation assessment communications concern hypothesis updating and revision, minimizing communication requirements through the concept of active "hypothesis processes," which are responsible for predicting their own evolution over time, is suggested. Robert B. Wesson, Frederick Hayes-Roth, John Burge, Cathleen Stasz, Carl A. Sunshine |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. | 4 |