Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Cathleen Stasz

dblp:117/7486 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.011986
Computer-supported cooperative work: examples and issues in one federal agency · CSCW 1986
Empirical software engineering › practitioner studies
workplace studies
0.011986
Computer-supported cooperative work: examples and issues in one federal agency · CSCW 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

case study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Computer-supported cooperative work: examples and issues in one federal agency
abstract
Article Free Access Share on Computer-supported cooperative work: examples and issues in one federal agency Authors: Cathleen Stasz The Rand Corporation The Rand CorporationView Profile , Tora K. Bikson The Rand Corporation The Rand CorporationView Profile Authors Info & Claims CSCW '86: Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative workDecember 1986 Pages 318–324https://doi.org/10.1145/637069.637111Online:03 December 1986Publication History 5citation314DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations5Total Downloads314Last 12 Months12Last 6 weeks1 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF
Cathleen Stasz, Tora K. Bikson
CSCW1
1981 Network Structures for Distributed Situation Assessment
abstract
A new approach to situation assessment is an automated distributed sensor network (DSN) consisting of many "intelligent" sensor devices that can pool their knowledge to achieve an accurate overall assessment of a situation. Laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate potential DSN organizations and to ascertain some general design principles. These experiments have been performed with a network of "sensor nodes," each of whom sees only a small portion of the entire environment and attempts to identify the environmental mobile entities as quickly as possible. To do this, they must cooperatively communicate their hypotheses and data, using a limited number of messages. Two general DSN organizations were tested. The first was hierarchical. The second was an "anarchic committee" whose nodes could each send messages to one, some, or all other nodes. The performance of the committee organization consistently surpassed the hierarchical one. This lent support to the contention that DSN architectures need to emphasize cooperative aspects of problem-solving. A machine-based simulation of such a network that achieved performance levels comparable to that of the human committee DSN organization was also constructed and tested. Because most situation assessment communications concern hypothesis updating and revision, minimizing communication requirements through the concept of active "hypothesis processes," which are responsible for predicting their own evolution over time, is suggested.
Robert B. Wesson, Frederick Hayes-Roth, John Burge, Cathleen Stasz, Carl A. Sunshine
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.4