Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Metzger

dblp:118/1658 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-4201-852XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network management and operations · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations › network security management
vulnerability management
0.212016
POSTER: VUDEC: A Framework for Vulnerability Management in Decentralized Communication Networks · CCS 2016
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
vulnerability assessment
0.112016
POSTER: VUDEC: A Framework for Vulnerability Management in Decentralized Communication Networks · CCS 2016
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 A Process Framework for Stakeholder-specific Visualization of Security Metrics
abstract
Awareness and knowledge management are key components to achieve a high level of information security in organizations. However, practical evidence suggests that there are significant discrepancies between the typical elements of security awareness campaigns, the decisions made and goals set by top-level management, and routine operations carried out by systems administration personnel. This paper presents Vis4Sec, a process framework for the generation and distribution of stakeholder-specific visualizations of security metrics, which assists in closing the gap between theoretical and practical information security by respecting the different points of view of the involved security report audiences. An implementation for patch management on Linux servers, deployed at a large data center, is used as a running example.
Tanja Hanauer, Wolfgang Hommel, Stefan Metzger, Daniela Pöhn
ARES3
2016 POSTER: VUDEC: A Framework for Vulnerability Management in Decentralized Communication Networks
abstract
Vulnerability management, often used as a generic term for any organizational and technical security controls in the context of identifying, assessing, and mitigating security-relevant software and network weaknesses, has specific challenges in decentralized communication networks such as research and education networks operated by higher education institutions. While many large organizations perform professional vulnerability management and related activities, especially risk management, which are supported by commercial and open source software products, universities and other academic environments still often struggle with ad-hoc and scope-limited approaches due to often unclear responsibilities and a lack of suitable tool support. This poster presents VUDEC, an integrated vulnerability management framework tailored for the requirements of decentrally operated networks; besides organizational aspects of the vulnerability management process, its implementation supports, among other functionality, a highly distributed vulnerability scan architecture and full multi-tenancy capability.
Michael Steinke, Stefan Metzger, Wolfgang Hommel
CCS2
2014 Géant-TrustBroker: Dynamic, Scalable Management of SAML-Based Inter-federation Authentication and Authorization Infrastructures
Daniela Pöhn, Stefan Metzger, Wolfgang Hommel
SEC2