Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Virgilio Borges

dblp:118/3209 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › feature location
feature annotation
0.112012
A Semi-Automatic Approach for Extracting Software Product Lines · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2012
Software maintenance and evolution › software reengineering
software modernization
0.112012
A Semi-Automatic Approach for Extracting Software Product Lines · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-automatic feature annotation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 A Semi-Automatic Approach for Extracting Software Product Lines
abstract
The extraction of nontrivial software product lines (SPL) from a legacy application is a time-consuming task. First, developers must identify the components responsible for the implementation of each program feature. Next, they must locate the lines of code that reference the components discovered in the previous step. Finally, they must extract those lines to independent modules or annotate them in some way. To speed up product line extraction, this paper describes a semi-automatic approach to annotate the code of optional features in SPLs. The proposed approach is based on an existing tool for product line development, called CIDE, that enhances standard IDEs with the ability to associate background colors with the lines of code that implement a feature. We have evaluated and successfully applied our approach to the extraction of optional features from three nontrivial systems: Prevayler (an in-memory database system), JFreeChart (a chart library), and ArgoUML (a UML modeling tool).
Marco Túlio Valente, Virgilio Borges, Leonardo Teixeira Passos
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2