Hiroshi Muraoka

dblp:118/3550 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 87% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
multi-class object detection
0.212014
Hard negative classes for multiple object detection · ICRA 2014
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.212014
Hard negative classes for multiple object detection · ICRA 2014
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › negative sampling
hard negative mining
0.112014
Hard negative classes for multiple object detection · ICRA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

one-vs-all training · 0.2multi-class classification · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Hard negative classes for multiple object detection
abstract
We propose an efficient method to train multiple object detectors simultaneously using a large scale image dataset. The one-vs-all approach that optimizes the boundary between positive samples from a target class and negative samples from the others has been the most standard approach for object detection. However, because this approach trains each object detector independently, the scores are not balanced between object classes. The proposed method combines ideas derived from both detection and classification in order to balance the scores across all object classes. We optimized the boundary between target classes and their “hard negative” samples, just as in detection, while simultaneously balancing the detector scores across object classes, as done in multi-class classification. We evaluated the performances on multi-class object detection using a subset of the ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2011 dataset and showed our method outperformed a de facto standard method.
Asako Kanezaki, Sho Inaba, Yoshitaka Ushiku, Yuya Yamashita, Hiroshi Muraoka, Yasuo Kuniyoshi, Tatsuya Harada
ICRA5