Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Trogdon
dblp:118/7350
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures
numerical linear algebra |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Analysis of stochastic Lanczos quadrature for spectrum approximation · ICML 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures › matrix approximation
spectral approximation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Analysis of stochastic Lanczos quadrature for spectrum approximation · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory
approximation error bound |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Analysis of stochastic Lanczos quadrature for spectrum approximation · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wasserstein distance · 1.0stochastic trace estimation · 1.0lanczos algorithm · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Analysis of stochastic Lanczos quadrature for spectrum approximationabstractThe cumulative empirical spectral measure (CESM) $\Phi[\mathbf{A}] : \mathbb{R} \to [0,1]$ of a $n\times n$ symmetric matrix $\mathbf{A}$ is defined as the fraction of eigenvalues of $\mathbf{A}$ less than a given threshold, i.e., $\Phi[\mathbf{A}](x) := \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{n} {\large\unicode{x1D7D9}}[ \lambda_i[\mathbf{A}]\leq x]$. Spectral sums $\operatorname{tr}(f[\mathbf{A}])$ can be computed as the Riemann–Stieltjes integral of $f$ against $\Phi[\mathbf{A}]$, so the task of estimating CESM arises frequently in a number of applications, including machine learning. We present an error analysis for stochastic Lanczos quadrature (SLQ). We show that SLQ obtains an approximation to the CESM within a Wasserstein distance of $t \: | \lambda_{\text{max}}[\mathbf{A}] - \lambda_{\text{min}}[\mathbf{A}] |$ with probability at least $1-\eta$, by applying the Lanczos algorithm for $\lceil 12 t^{-1} + \frac{1}{2} \rceil$ iterations to $\lceil 4 ( n+2 )^{-1}t^{-2} \ln(2n\eta^{-1}) \rceil$ vectors sampled independently and uniformly from the unit sphere. We additionally provide (matrix-dependent) a posteriori error bounds for the Wasserstein and Kolmogorov–Smirnov distances between the output of this algorithm and the true CESM. The quality of our bounds is demonstrated using numerical experiments. Tyler Chen, Thomas Trogdon, Shashanka Ubaru |
ICML | 2 |