Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alex Memory

dblp:118/8433 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5966-6339ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 64% Data mining · 32% Data models and query languages · 5%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
schema mapping
0.722019
A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Mapping Using Diverse Noisy Evidence · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2019
A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Mapping · ICDE 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
probabilistic reasoning
0.412019
A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Mapping Using Diverse Noisy Evidence · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2019
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.212013
Detecting insider threats in a real corporate database of computer usage activity · KDD 2013
Data mining › anomaly detection
graph anomaly detection
0.212013
Detecting insider threats in a real corporate database of computer usage activity · KDD 2013
Data models and query languages › query language
visual query language
0.012013
Detecting insider threats in a real corporate database of computer usage activity · KDD 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic reasoning · 1.0collective mapping discovery · 0.8temporal sequence analysis · 0.2statistical anomaly detection · 0.2dynamic graph processing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Causal Discovery of Cyber Attack Phases
abstract
Causal discovery algorithms are increasingly being used to discover valid, novel, and significant causal relationships from large amounts of observational data. Cyberattacks are hypothesized to evolve according to the Cyber Kill Chain® which consists of a causal model describing the phases of a cyberattack. This paper introduces causal discovery to cybersecurity research and provides evidence of the kill chain with an extensive empirical assessment of two databases of real cyberattacks.
W. Graham Mueller, Alex Memory, Kyle Bartrem
ICMLA2
2019 A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Mapping Using Diverse Noisy Evidence
abstract
We propose a probabilistic approach to the problem of schema mapping. Our approach is declarative, scalable, and extensible. It builds upon recent results in both schema mapping and probabilistic reasoning and contributes novel techniques in both fields. We introduce the problem of schema mapping selection, that is, choosing the best mapping from a space of potential mappings, given both metadata constraints and a data example. As selection has to reason holistically about the inputs and the dependencies between the chosen mappings, we define a new schema mapping optimization problem which captures interactions between mappings as well as inconsistencies and incompleteness in the input. We then introduce Collective Mapping Discovery (CMD), our solution to this problem using state-of-the-art probabilistic reasoning techniques. Our evaluation on a wide range of integration scenarios, including several real-world domains, demonstrates that CMD effectively combines data and metadata information to infer highly accurate mappings even with significant levels of noise.
Angelika Kimmig, Alex Memory, Renée J. Miller, Lise Getoor
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2017 A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Mapping
abstract
We propose a probabilistic approach to the problem of schema mapping. Our approach is declarative, scalable, and extensible. It builds upon recent results in both schema mapping and probabilistic reasoning and contributes novel techniques in both fields. We introduce the problem of mapping selection, that is, choosing the best mapping from a space of potential mappings, given both metadata constraints and a data example. As selection has to reason holistically about the inputs and the dependencies between the chosen mappings, we define a new schema mapping optimization problem which captures interactions between mappings. We then introduce Collective Mapping Discovery (CMD), our solution to this problem using stateof- the-art probabilistic reasoning techniques, which allows for inconsistencies and incompleteness. Using hundreds of realistic integration scenarios, we demonstrate that the accuracy of CMD is more than 33% above that of metadata-only approaches already for small data examples, and that CMD routinely finds perfect mappings even if a quarter of the data is inconsistent.
Angelika Kimmig, Alex Memory, Renée J. Miller, Lise Getoor
ICDE2
2013 Detecting insider threats in a real corporate database of computer usage activity
abstract
This paper reports on methods and results of an applied research project by a team consisting of SAIC and four universities to develop, integrate, and evaluate new approaches to detect the weak signals characteristic of insider threats on organizations' information systems. Our system combines structural and semantic information from a real corporate database of monitored activity on their users' computers to detect independently developed red team inserts of malicious insider activities. We have developed and applied multiple algorithms for anomaly detection based on suspected scenarios of malicious insider behavior, indicators of unusual activities, high-dimensional statistical patterns, temporal sequences, and normal graph evolution. Algorithms and representations for dynamic graph processing provide the ability to scale as needed for enterprise-level deployments on real-time data streams. We have also developed a visual language for specifying combinations of features, baselines, peer groups, time periods, and algorithms to detect anomalies suggestive of instances of insider threat behavior. We defined over 100 data features in seven categories based on approximately 5.5 million actions per day from approximately 5,500 users. We have achieved area under the ROC curve values of up to 0.979 and lift values of 65 on the top 50 user-days identified on two months of real data.
Ted E. Senator, Henry G. Goldberg, Alex Memory, William T. Young, Bradley Rees, Robert Pierce, Daniel Huang 0003, Matthew Reardon, David A. Bader, Edmond Chow, Irfan A. Essa, Joshua Jones, Vinay Bettadapura, Polo Chau, Oded Green, Oguz Kaya, Anita Zakrzewska, Erica Briscoe, Rudolph Louis Mappus IV, Robert McColl, Lora Weiss, Thomas G. Dietterich, Alan Fern, Weng-Keen Wong, Shubhomoy Das, Andrew Emmott, Jed Irvine, Jay-Yoon Lee, Danai Koutra, Christos Faloutsos, Daniel D. Corkill, Lisa Friedland, Amanda Gentzel, David D. Jensen
KDD3