Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ben Fortescue

dblp:118/8662 · also Benjamin Fortescue · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 57% Information theory · 43%
Network and information security
2 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory › information measures › multiterminal information measures
common information
0.312018
The Conditional Common Information in Classical and Quantum Secret Key Distillation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Quantum computing and quantum information
entanglement measures
0.312018
The Conditional Common Information in Classical and Quantum Secret Key Distillation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Information theory › information-theoretic security
secret key agreement
0.312018
The Conditional Common Information in Classical and Quantum Secret Key Distillation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Quantum computing and quantum information › entanglement measures
squashed entanglement
0.312018
The Conditional Common Information in Classical and Quantum Secret Key Distillation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
secret key agreement
0.212015
Distributions Attaining Secret Key at a Rate of the Conditional Mutual Information · CRYPTO (2) 2015
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secret sharing
ramp secret sharing
0.112012
Reducing the Quantum Communication Cost of Quantum Secret Sharing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secret sharing
0.112012
Reducing the Quantum Communication Cost of Quantum Secret Sharing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum cryptography
quantum secret sharing
0.112012
Reducing the Quantum Communication Cost of Quantum Secret Sharing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum error correction
stabilizer codes
0.112012
Reducing the Quantum Communication Cost of Quantum Secret Sharing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012
Information theory
information-theoretic security
0.112015
Distributions Attaining Secret Key at a Rate of the Conditional Mutual Information · CRYPTO (2) 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

incoherent encoding · 0.3coherent encoding · 0.3imperfect secret sharing · 0.3classical encryption · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 The Conditional Common Information in Classical and Quantum Secret Key Distillation
abstract
In this paper, we consider two extensions of the Gács-Körner common information to three variables, theconditional common information(cCI) and thecoarse-grained conditional common information(ccCI). Both quantities are shown to be useful technical tools in the study of classical and quantum resource transformations. In particular, the ccCI is shown to have an operational interpretation as the optimal rate of secret key extraction from an eavesdropped classical sourcepXYZwhen Alice (X) and Bob (Y) are unable to communicate but share common randomness with the eavesdropper Eve (Z). Moving to the quantum setting, we consider two different ways of generating a tripartite quantum state from classical correlationspXYZ: (1) coherent encodings Σxyz√(pxyz)|xyz> and (2) incoherent encodings Σxyzpxyz|xyz>xyz|. We study how well can Alice and Bob extract secret key from these quantum sources using quantum operations compared with the extraction of key from the underlying classical sourcespXYZusing classical operations. While the power of quantum mechanics increases Alice and Bob's ability to generate shared randomness, it also equips Eve with a greater arsenal of eavesdropping attacks. Therefore, it is not obvious who gains the greatest advantage for distilling secret key when replacing a classical source with a quantum one. We first demonstrate that the classical key rate ofpXYZis equivalent to the quantum key rate for an incoherent quantum encoding of the distribution. For coherent encodings, we next show that the classical and quantum rates are generally incomparable, and in fact, their difference can be arbitrarily large in either direction. Finally, we introduce a “zoo” of entangled tripartite states all characterized by the conditional common information of their encoded probability distributions. Remarkably, for these states almost all entanglement measures, such as Alice and Bob's entanglement cost, squashed entanglement, and relative entropy of entanglement, can be sharply bounded or even exactly expressed in terms of the conditional common information. In the latter case, we thus present a rare instance in which the various entropic entanglement measures of a quantum state can be explicitly calculated.
Eric Chitambar, Ben Fortescue, Min-Hsiu Hsieh
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2015 Distributions Attaining Secret Key at a Rate of the Conditional Mutual Information
Eric Chitambar, Ben Fortescue, Min-Hsiu Hsieh
CRYPTO (2)2
2012 Reducing the Quantum Communication Cost of Quantum Secret Sharing
abstract
We demonstrate a new construction for perfect quantum secret sharing (QSS) schemes based on imperfect “ramp” secret sharing combined with classical encryption, in which the individual parties' shares are split into quantum and classical components, allowing the former to be of lower dimension than the secret itself. We show that such schemes can be performed with smaller quantum components and lower overall quantum communication than required for existing methods. We further demonstrate that one may combine both imperfect quantum and imperfect classical secret sharing to produce an overall perfect QSS scheme, and that examples of such schemes (which we construct) can have the smallest quantum and classical share components possible for their access structures, something provably not achievable using perfect underlying schemes. Our construction has significant potential for being adapted to other QSS schemes based on stabilizer codes.
Ben Fortescue, Gilad Gour
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2005 Inefficiency and classical communication bounds for conversion between partially entangled pure bipartite quantum states
abstract
We present explicit bounds on the classical communication cost and inefficiency of entanglement dilution via the Lo-Popescu protocol, for the case of two-term (single-qubit) entangled states. By considering a two-stage dilution, we consequently use prior results to obtain meaningful bounds on the classical communication cost and inefficiency of dilution between two-term partially entangled states.
Ben Fortescue, Hoi-Kwong Lo
ISIT1