Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joop van de Pol
dblp:119/0049
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 8 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 69% Hardware security and side channels · 31% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key cryptanalysis › RSA cryptanalysis
partial key exposure attack |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Third is All You Need: Extended Partial Key Exposure Attack on CRT-RSA with Additive Exponent Blinding · ASIACRYPT (4) 2022 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
public-key encryption |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Third is All You Need: Extended Partial Key Exposure Attack on CRT-RSA with Additive Exponent Blinding · ASIACRYPT (4) 2022 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
RSA |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Third is All You Need: Extended Partial Key Exposure Attack on CRT-RSA with Additive Exponent Blinding · ASIACRYPT (4) 2022 |
Hardware security and side channels › hardware attacks
side-channel and fault attacks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Third is All You Need: Extended Partial Key Exposure Attack on CRT-RSA with Additive Exponent Blinding · ASIACRYPT (4) 2022 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | "Ooh Aah... Just a Little Bit" : A Small Amount of Side Channel Can Go a Long Way · CHES 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
partial key exposure · 0.6additive exponent blinding · 0.6CRT-RSA · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Third is All You Need: Extended Partial Key Exposure Attack on CRT-RSA with Additive Exponent Blinding
Yuanyuan Zhou 0006, Joop van de Pol, Yu Yu 0001, François-Xavier Standaert |
ASIACRYPT (4) | 2 |
| 2016 | Amplifying side channels through performance degradation
Thomas Allan, Billy Bob Brumley, Katrina Falkner, Joop van de Pol, Yuval Yarom |
ACSAC | 4 |
| 2016 | Bootstrapping BGV ciphertexts with a wider choice of p and qabstractThe authors describe a method to bootstrap a packed BGV ciphertext which does not depend (as much) on any special properties of the plaintext and ciphertext moduli. Prior ‘efficient’ methods such as that of Gentry et al . (PKC 2012) required a ciphertext modulus q which was close to a power of the plaintext modulus p . This enables the authors’ method to be applied in a larger number of situations. The authors’ basic bootstrapping technique makes use of a representation based on polynomials of the group over the finite field , followed by polynomial interpolation of the reduction mod p map over the coefficients of the algebraic group. This technique is then extended to the full BGV packed ciphertext space, using a method whose depth depends only logarithmically on the number of packed elements. This method may be of interest as an alternative to the method of Alperin‐Sheriff and Peikert (CRYPTO 2013). To aid efficiency, the authors utilise the ring/field switching technique of Gentry et al . (SCN 2012, JCS 2013). Emmanuela Orsini, Joop van de Pol, Nigel P. Smart |
IET Inf. Secur. | 2 |
| 2015 | Just a Little Bit More
Joop van de Pol, Nigel P. Smart, Yuval Yarom |
CT-RSA | 1 |
| 2015 | Finding shortest lattice vectors faster using quantum searchabstractBy applying a quantum search algorithm to various heuristic and provable sieve algorithms from the literature, we obtain improved asymptotic quantum results for solving the shortest vector problem on lattices. With quantum computers we can provably find a shortest vector in time $$2^{1.799n + o(n)}$$ , improving upon the classical time complexities of $$2^{2.465n + o(n)}$$ of Pujol and Stehlé and the $$2^{2n + o(n)}$$ of Micciancio and Voulgaris, while heuristically we expect to find a shortest vector in time $$2^{0.268n + o(n)}$$ , improving upon the classical time complexity of $$2^{0.298n + o(n)}$$ of Laarhoven and De Weger. These quantum complexities will be an important guide for the selection of parameters for post-quantum cryptosystems based on the hardness of the shortest vector problem. Thijs Laarhoven, Michele Mosca, Joop van de Pol |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 3 |
| 2014 | "Ooh Aah... Just a Little Bit" : A Small Amount of Side Channel Can Go a Long Way
Naomi Benger, Joop van de Pol, Nigel P. Smart, Yuval Yarom |
CHES | 2 |
| 2013 | Estimating Key Sizes for High Dimensional Lattice-Based Systems
Joop van de Pol, Nigel P. Smart |
IMACC | 1 |
| 2013 | Solving the Shortest Vector Problem in Lattices Faster Using Quantum Search
Thijs Laarhoven, Michele Mosca, Joop van de Pol |
PQCrypto | 3 |