Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hideyuki Maeda
dblp:119/0080
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and Efficiency · SIGIR 2017 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › probabilistic retrieval model
BM25 |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and Efficiency · SIGIR 2017 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
embedding-based retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017 |
Information retrieval
image retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and Efficiency · SIGIR 2017 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017 |
Information retrieval › image retrieval
semantic image retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017 |
Information retrieval › question answering
community question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and Efficiency · SIGIR 2017 |
Information retrieval
query log analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine translation · 0.6LSTM · 0.6BM25 · 0.6distance metric learning · 0.3deep convolutional siamese network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Scalable Twitter User Clustering Approach Boosted by Personalized PageRank
Anup Naik, Hideyuki Maeda, Vibhor Kanojia, Sumio Fujita |
PAKDD (1) | 2 |
| 2017 | LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and EfficiencyabstractRecent advances in neural networks, along with the growth of rich and diverse community question answering (cQA) data, have enabled researchers to construct robust open-domain question answering (QA) systems. It is often claimed that such state-of-the-art QA systems far outperform traditional IR baselines such as BM25. However, most such studies rely on relatively small data sets, e.g., those extracted from the old TREC QA tracks. Given massive training data plus a separate corpus of Q&A pairs as the target knowledge source, how well would such a system really perform? How fast would it respond? In this demonstration, we provide the attendees of SIGIR 2017 an opportunity to experience a live comparison of two open-domain QA systems, one based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture with over 11 million Yahoo! Chiebukuro (i.e., Japanese Yahoo! Answers) questions and over 27.4 million answers for training, and the other based on BM25. Both systems use the same Q&A knowledge source for answer retrieval. Our core demonstration system is a pair of Japanese monolingual QA systems, but we leverage machine translation for letting the SIGIR attendees enter English questions and compare the Japanese responses from the two systems after translating them into English. Sosuke Kato, Riku Togashi, Hideyuki Maeda, Sumio Fujita, Tetsuya Sakai |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 2017 | Find Shoes Like TheseabstractWe present an Euclidean embedding image representation, which serves to rank auction item images through wide range of semantic similarity spectrum, in the order of the relevance to the given query image much more effective than the baseline method in terms of a graded relevance measure. Our method uses three stream deep convolutional siamese networks to learn a distance metric and we leverage search query logs of an auction item search of the largest auction service in Japan. Unlike previous approaches, we define the inter-image relevance on the basis of user queries in the logs used to search each auction item, which enables us to acquire the image representation preserving the features concerning user intents in real e-commerce world. Hideyuki Maeda |
SIGIR | 1 |