Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hideyuki Maeda

dblp:119/0080 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering
0.312017
LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and Efficiency · SIGIR 2017
Information retrieval › retrieval models › probabilistic retrieval model
BM25
0.312017
LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and Efficiency · SIGIR 2017
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
embedding-based retrieval
0.312017
Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017
Information retrieval
image retrieval
0.312017
Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017
Information retrieval
ranking
0.312017
LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and Efficiency · SIGIR 2017
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.312017
Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017
Information retrieval › image retrieval
semantic image retrieval
0.312017
Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017
Information retrieval › question answering
community question answering
0.112017
LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and Efficiency · SIGIR 2017
Information retrieval
query log analysis
0.112017
Find Shoes Like These · SIGIR 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine translation · 0.6LSTM · 0.6BM25 · 0.6distance metric learning · 0.3deep convolutional siamese network · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Scalable Twitter User Clustering Approach Boosted by Personalized PageRank
Anup Naik, Hideyuki Maeda, Vibhor Kanojia, Sumio Fujita
PAKDD (1)2
2017 LSTM vs. BM25 for Open-domain QA: A Hands-on Comparison of Effectiveness and Efficiency
abstract
Recent advances in neural networks, along with the growth of rich and diverse community question answering (cQA) data, have enabled researchers to construct robust open-domain question answering (QA) systems. It is often claimed that such state-of-the-art QA systems far outperform traditional IR baselines such as BM25. However, most such studies rely on relatively small data sets, e.g., those extracted from the old TREC QA tracks. Given massive training data plus a separate corpus of Q&A pairs as the target knowledge source, how well would such a system really perform? How fast would it respond? In this demonstration, we provide the attendees of SIGIR 2017 an opportunity to experience a live comparison of two open-domain QA systems, one based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture with over 11 million Yahoo! Chiebukuro (i.e., Japanese Yahoo! Answers) questions and over 27.4 million answers for training, and the other based on BM25. Both systems use the same Q&A knowledge source for answer retrieval. Our core demonstration system is a pair of Japanese monolingual QA systems, but we leverage machine translation for letting the SIGIR attendees enter English questions and compare the Japanese responses from the two systems after translating them into English.
Sosuke Kato, Riku Togashi, Hideyuki Maeda, Sumio Fujita, Tetsuya Sakai
SIGIR3
2017 Find Shoes Like These
abstract
We present an Euclidean embedding image representation, which serves to rank auction item images through wide range of semantic similarity spectrum, in the order of the relevance to the given query image much more effective than the baseline method in terms of a graded relevance measure. Our method uses three stream deep convolutional siamese networks to learn a distance metric and we leverage search query logs of an auction item search of the largest auction service in Japan. Unlike previous approaches, we define the inter-image relevance on the basis of user queries in the logs used to search each auction item, which enables us to acquire the image representation preserving the features concerning user intents in real e-commerce world.
Hideyuki Maeda
SIGIR1