Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jason Saraghi

dblp:119/1439 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 67% Geometric modeling and processing · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
active appearance model fitting
0.212013
Rank Minimization across Appearance and Shape for AAM Ensemble Fitting · ICCV 2013
Image and video processing
rank minimization
0.212013
Rank Minimization across Appearance and Shape for AAM Ensemble Fitting · ICCV 2013
Geometric modeling and processing
shape and appearance modeling
0.212013
Rank Minimization across Appearance and Shape for AAM Ensemble Fitting · ICCV 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rank minimization · 0.2ensemble fitting · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Rank Minimization across Appearance and Shape for AAM Ensemble Fitting
abstract
Active Appearance Models (AAMs) employ a paradigm of inverting a synthesis model of how an object can vary in terms of shape and appearance. As a result, the ability of AAMs to register an unseen object image is intrinsically linked to two factors. First, how well the synthesis model can reconstruct the object image. Second, the degrees of freedom in the model. Fewer degrees of freedom yield a higher likelihood of good fitting performance. In this paper we look at how these seemingly contrasting factors can complement one another for the problem of AAM fitting of an ensemble of images stemming from a constrained set (e.g. an ensemble of face images of the same person).
Sridha Sridharan, Jason Saraghi, Simon Lucey
ICCV3