Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhihao Cen
dblp:119/6293
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Offline Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing Production Bidding Policies · KDD 2024 |
Computational finance and economics
online advertising |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Offline Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing Production Bidding Policies · KDD 2024 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
deformable body simulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerate Neural Subspace-Based Reduced-Order Solver of Deformable Simulation by Lipschitz Optimization · ACM Trans. Graph. 2024 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
model reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerate Neural Subspace-Based Reduced-Order Solver of Deformable Simulation by Lipschitz Optimization · ACM Trans. Graph. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hybrid agent architecture · 1.5deep neural network · 1.5neural network · 0.8lipschitz optimization · 0.8cubature approximation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Offline Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing Production Bidding PoliciesabstractThe online advertising market, with its thousands of auctions run per second, presents a daunting challenge for advertisers who wish to optimize their spend under a budget constraint. Thus, advertising platforms typically provide automated agents to their customers, which act on their behalf to bid for impression opportunities in real time at scale. Because these proxy agents are owned by the platform but use advertiser funds to operate, there is a strong practical need to balance reliability and explainability of the agent with optimizing power. We propose a generalizable approach to optimizing bidding policies in production environments by learning from real data using offline reinforcement learning. This approach can be used to optimize any differentiable base policy (practically, a heuristic policy based on principles which the advertiser can easily understand), and only requires data generated by the base policy itself. We use a hybrid agent architecture that combines arbitrary base policies with deep neural networks, where only the optimized base policy parameters are eventually deployed, and the neural network part is discarded after training. We demonstrate that such an architecture achieves statistically significant performance gains in both simulated and at-scale production bidding environments compared to the default production bidding policy. Our approach does not incur additional infrastructure, safety, or explainability costs, as it directly optimizes the parameters of existing production routines without necessarily replacing them with black box-style models like neural networks. Dmytro Korenkevych, Frank Cheng, Artsiom Balakir, Alex Nikulkov, Lingnan Gao, Zhihao Cen, Zuobing Xu, Zheqing Zhu |
KDD | 6 |
| 2024 | Accelerate Neural Subspace-Based Reduced-Order Solver of Deformable Simulation by Lipschitz OptimizationabstractReduced-order simulation is an emerging method for accelerating physical simulations with high DOFs, and recently developed neural-network-based methods with nonlinear subspaces have been proven effective in diverse applications as more concise subspaces can be detected. However, the complexity and landscape of simulation objectives within the subspace have not been optimized, which leaves room for enhancement of the convergence speed. This work focuses on this point by proposing a general method for finding optimized subspace mappings, enabling further acceleration of neural reduced-order simulations while capturing comprehensive representations of the configuration manifolds. We achieve this by optimizing the Lipschitz energy of the elasticity term in the simulation objective, and incorporating the cubature approximation into the training process to manage the high memory and time demands associated with optimizing the newly introduced energy. Our method is versatile and applicable to both supervised and unsupervised settings for optimizing the parameterizations of the configuration manifolds. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through general cases in both quasi-static and dynamics simulations. Our method achieves acceleration factors of up to 6.83 while consistently preserving comparable simulation accuracy in various cases, including large twisting, bending, and rotational deformations with collision handling. This novel approach offers significant potential for accelerating physical simulations, and can be a good add-on to existing neural-network-based solutions in modeling complex deformable objects. Aoran Lyu, Shixian Zhao, Chuhua Xian, Zhihao Cen, Hongmin Cai, Guoxin Fang |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 4 |