Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

George Michaelson

dblp:119/6496 · also George G. Michaelson, George Geoffrey Michaelson · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Routing and switching · 59% Network measurement and analytics · 33% Network management and operations · 6%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing › BGP
BGP security
0.412020
On Measuring RPKI Relying Parties · Internet Measurement Conference 2020
Routing and switching
inter-domain routing
0.412020
On Measuring RPKI Relying Parties · Internet Measurement Conference 2020
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement
routing measurement
0.412020
On Measuring RPKI Relying Parties · Internet Measurement Conference 2020
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing › inter-domain routing security
RPKI
0.412020
On Measuring RPKI Relying Parties · Internet Measurement Conference 2020
Network measurement and analytics
internet measurement
0.112012
Mitigating sampling error when measuring internet client IPv6 capabilities · Internet Measurement Conference 2012
Network management and operations › network robustness
routing robustness
0.112020
On Measuring RPKI Relying Parties · Internet Measurement Conference 2020
Internet architecture and protocols › IPv6
IPv6 deployment
0.012012
Mitigating sampling error when measuring internet client IPv6 capabilities · Internet Measurement Conference 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

longitudinal measurement · 0.4web-based measurement · 0.1ad-based recruitment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 On Measuring RPKI Relying Parties
abstract
In this paper, we introduce a framework to observe RPKI relying parties (i.e., those that fetch RPKI data from the distributed repository) and present insights into this ecosystem for the first time. Our longitudinal study of data gathered from three RPKI certification authorities (AFRINIC, APNIC, and our own CA) identifies different deployment models of relying parties and (surprisingly) prevalent inconsistent fetching behavior that affects Internet routing robustness. Our results reveal nearly 90% of relying parties are unable to connect to delegated publication points under certain conditions, which leads to erroneous invalidation of IP prefixes and likely widespread loss of network reachability.
John Kristoff, Randy Bush, Chris Kanich, George Michaelson, Amreesh Phokeer, Thomas C. Schmidt, Matthias Wählisch
Internet Measurement Conference4
2013 Understanding IPv6 Populations in the Wild
Manish Karir, Geoff Huston, George Michaelson, Michael D. Bailey
PAM3
2012 Mitigating sampling error when measuring internet client IPv6 capabilities
abstract
Despite the predicted exhaustion of unallocated IPv4 addresses between 2012 and 2014, it remains unclear how many current clients can use its successor, IPv6, to access the Internet. We propose a refinement of previous measurement studies that mitigates intrinsic measurement biases, and demonstrate a novel web-based technique using Google ads to perform IPv6 capability testing on a wider range of clients. After applying our sampling error reduction, we find that 6% of world-wide connections are from IPv6-capable clients, but only 1--2% of connections preferred IPv6 in dual-stack (dual-stack failure rates less than 1%). Except for an uptick around IPv6-day 2011 these proportions were relatively constant, while the percentage of connections with IPv6-capable DNS resolvers has increased to nearly 60%. The percentage of connections from clients with native IPv6 using happy eyeballs has risen to over 20%.
Sebastian Zander, Lachlan L. H. Andrew, Grenville J. Armitage, Geoff Huston, George Michaelson
Internet Measurement Conference5
1985 Analysis and Design for a Standard Transport Protocol
abstract
Abstract In the development of computer networks, the trend towards open systems interconnection is creating the need for standard protocols. The transport level protocols published by ECMA and ISO are supported by the Department of Industry as ‘intercept’ standards to be adopted by the computing community as a whole. This paper presents the published standards interpreted as a set of state transition diagrams. This reinterpretation is a necessary prerequisite to the method of implementation which is based on a finite state automaton. We summarize the advantages of a software ‘funnel machine’ to effect the state transitions during the execution of the transport protocol server. The same analysis and design technique has been used successfully to implement network and link protocol handlers. We recommend its adoption on a variety of machines in any programming language to ensure a relatively short development period and to achieve compatability among the different classes: 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, of the transport protocol.
P. W. Garratt, George Michaelson
Softw. Pract. Exp.2