Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael G. Endres
dblp:119/8865
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-1411-360XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression quantification
gene expression deconvolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Improving deconvolution methods in biology through open innovation competitions: an application to the connectivity map · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Improving deconvolution methods in biology through open innovation competitions: an application to the connectivity map · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest regression · 0.5gaussian mixture model · 0.5deep learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Improving deconvolution methods in biology through open innovation competitions: an application to the connectivity mapabstractMOTIVATION: Do machine learning methods improve standard deconvolution techniques for gene expression data? This article uses a unique new dataset combined with an open innovation competition to evaluate a wide range of approaches developed by 294 competitors from 20 countries. The competition's objective was to address a deconvolution problem critical to analyzing genetic perturbations from the Connectivity Map. The issue consists of separating gene expression of individual genes from raw measurements obtained from gene pairs. We evaluated the outcomes using ground-truth data (direct measurements for single genes) obtained from the same samples. RESULTS: We find that the top-ranked algorithm, based on random forest regression, beat the other methods in accuracy and reproducibility; more traditional gaussian-mixture methods performed well and tended to be faster, and the best deep learning approach yielded outcomes slightly inferior to the above methods. We anticipate researchers in the field will find the dataset and algorithms developed in this study to be a powerful research tool for benchmarking their deconvolution methods and a resource useful for multiple applications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data is freely available at clue.io/data (section Contests) and the software is on GitHub at https://github.com/cmap/gene_deconvolution_challenge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Andrea Blasco, Ted Natoli, Michael G. Endres, Rinat A. Sergeev, Steven Randazzo, Jin H. Paik, N. J. Maximilian Macaluso, Rajiv Narayan, David Peck, Karim R. Lakhani, Aravind Subramanian |
Bioinform. | 3 |